RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 months agoYeshexbear.netimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1227arrow-down11
arrow-up1226arrow-down1imageYeshexbear.netRNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareNephewAlphaBravo [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up73arrow-down1·8 months agoI like the implication that trains aren’t vehicles.
minus-squareJoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57·8 months agoOr that the train is the one at fault. 40% of Trains strike their spouses, you know.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·8 months agoNo? Where is that implied?
minus-squareanarcho_blinkenist [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·8 months agoright in the headline, where it didn’t say “another vehicle”
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·8 months agoMe: “I was complented by a guy I didn’t know” You: so you must be a woman then. It absolutely doesn’t imply that. YOU are reading into it.
I like the implication that trains aren’t vehicles.
Or that the train is the one at fault. 40% of Trains strike their spouses, you know.
No? Where is that implied?
right in the headline, where it didn’t say “another vehicle”
Me: “I was complented by a guy I didn’t know”
You: so you must be a woman then.
It absolutely doesn’t imply that. YOU are reading into it.