• Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    They won’t if they used water to dilute it. The gas station probably banks on the cars being able to leave the area after refueling. They will run off the old fuel at the bottom of the tank and in the fuel lines for a bit.

    • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They most likely use ethanol to dilute it.
      Engines will run just fine on it for years (until they don’t), and Russia has more than enough of it.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I would personally hazard a guess at diesel. It does have such a low octane number that octane isn’t really a relevant factor for it, it won’t immediately destroy an engine, and Russia’s oil & gas industry will already be making it in large quantities and probably even transporting it to the same places as the petrol

        • Triumph@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Diesel is rated by cetane, not octane, and the cetane numbers are lower. There’s nowhere that diesel would have a cetane pump rating of 92.

          That’s certainly gasoline.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Sorry, to clarify: my guess is that the petrol is being diluted with diesel. That would work better than most other adulterants, and it would also explain a drop in measured octane. I dd specifically mean octane; you can measure diesel’s octane and it is very low, it’s just not relevant in normal usage because diesel engines ignite their fuel differently to petrol ones

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends on how much water. A small amount of water and the engine will run better when warm, this has been known for years. (in 1915 some engines came with the factory with a separate carburetor just for adding water) It doesn’t work if there is any ethanol in the fuel though, so almost nobody does it. The biggest downside is it needs a warm engine, if the engine is not warm it just runs bad, and in the worst cases it won’t even start.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You’re talking about water injection, which is very, very different from having water in your fuel lines, which will make the car not run at all. Water has a higher specific density than gasoline, and will settle to the bottom of the tank, which is where the fuel pump pickups are located. And an internal combustion engine cannot combust water because it’s… water.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Water and gasoline do mix just fine in small amounts. When the car is moving it shakes enough to mix a little more. This is small amounts though, they may be mixing more water than that.

          Other reports suggest this isn’t a case of mixing water, but instead a low grade gasoline that shouldn’t be used in engines because of ocatane.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Wouldn’t water increase octane rating, since higher octane fuel is harder to ignite wth compression and water wouldn’t ignite at all?

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I don’t know what that tool measures but I wouldn’t be surprised if it didn’t account for water correctly.

          Though since then I’ve read reports that this is not water but just bad gasoline.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            My personal guess elsewhere in this thread was diesel, since it does have an extremely low octane number compared to gasoline and it would be easy for Russia’s infrastructure to supply