Honestly I’m supposed to be looking for a new place, but now I’m just looking at castles like, yeah I could make this work.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Don’t be fooled. Castles are so much more expensive than you think. They are heritage sites, you are obligated to keep it well maintained. This can cost between 100k to 1m per year, or even much more depending on the state and size. Next to that you’re not allowed to insulate it or replace the windows with double glass, so you will spend thousands per year just not to freeze to death.

    The reason these castles are so cheap is because the state is in poor condition and the current owner doesn’t have the funds to fix it to regulatory standards. So you can assume you will spend 5 to 10m (if not more) into it after buying it, then to have the previous mentioned yearly maintenance costs on top of that.

    I know because my French branch of the family used to live in a castle.

    If you fail to keep the castle in shape you can get serious fines and even lose ownership. And depending on the country, prison time.

    Then there are the taxes that are not fun at all.

    So when you buy one, make sure you have at least 20m ready to spend the first 1 to 5 years. But to be sure you won’t go bankrupt, better have 50m as a target as costs always end up much higher than expected. It happens a lot, people buying a castle then to go bankrupt due to the insanely high maintenance costs.

    • MrShankles@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Another reason billionaire’s are worthless. I know what I’d be doing with that kind of money

      Probably also one of the many many reasons I would never be a billionaire… I just don’t have the heart for it

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The cheap ones, mostly in France and Belgium, often are ruins or close to that state. They come with mold, wood worms and rot.

        Here in the Netherlands you could live in a castle for free* (not own it). The * was that you were responsible for renovating it. The responsibilities also included the renovating costs. So you would be the staff who had to pay and work to renovate someone else’s house. Again, looks like a nice deal, living in a castle for free, until you find out what the costs actually are. It’s cheaper to rent in New York and then you won’t have to work next to your actual job.

        • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Honestly not that different from renting in much of the US. In theory my landlord should have to pay for the repairs that aren’t my fault. In reality it’s more efficient for me to just pay out of pocket and do it myself rather than wait for him to fix it. I spent weeks without running water later summer because the well pump broke and he dinked around doing everything but replacing it (which is what needed done). I kinda like the idea that nobody “owns” a home, they just take on the responsibility of upkeep.

          • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Yeah the social housing company I rent from works very hard to do a little as possible for their renters. I also do stuff myself out of my own pocket. But a castle is a different story, the upkeep costs far exceed my current rent haha