Did you literally just download the PDF and search for those three things, see 0, and then close it?
Because even just skimming thru any of the 193 pages would show you none of it’s is about specific policy positions, largely because with 4 years to the next presidential election, that would be entirely useless…
Like, we do not want the DNC picking policy, that’s what the candidate we vote for in primaries do.
A large organization like the DNC dictating policy for politicians to follow and using their influence as a party to get those people elected is what got us here in the fuckign first place
The paper is going to seem boring and it’s not going to have what you think, be cause it wasn’t written for us, and it wasn’t written up to be a list of reasons why Kamala lost, be ause everyone reading it would be very aware of why that happened.
The point of the paper was what a nonbiased organization could do to fix shit.
So (again, fucking obviously) it’s not going to list policy positions to push.
It’s not supposed to discuss policy, it’s supposed to discuss the reasons she lost. Well, really, everyone knows those already, it’s supposed to discuss things to improve in future campaigns. Except you can’t have such a large organization telling individual candidates what to do. Look it’s not for you, ok, you wouldn’t understand.
Yeah but have you considered this, from Ken Martin’s biggest Stan?
https://lemmy.world/comment/23861489
It’s not supposed to discuss policy, it’s supposed to discuss the reasons she lost. Well, really, everyone knows those already, it’s supposed to discuss things to improve in future campaigns. Except you can’t have such a large organization telling individual candidates what to do. Look it’s not for you, ok, you wouldn’t understand.