• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I dont know what’s worse a parent losing their kid down the automatic mail belt or choosing to send their kid via mail to save a few pennies

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      save a few pennies

      Parcels tend to be an order of magnitude cheaper than transporting a person via trains, car/carriage etc. If you were poor, sending the kid via parcel might have been the only option to get them to a place. Though obviously it’s a piss-poor option, great way to kill, cripple or traumatize your child for life. Travelling via parcel might be doable for the 2-3 days a parcel might take today, but in those days parcels weren’t delivered that fast. Imagine being stuck in a dark, small box for 2 weeks.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        To be fair, pennies were worth a lot more in 1913.

        In 1913, 1 penny was worth 0.01 1913 dollars.

        Today, 1 penny is only worth 0.01 2026 dollars, so you can see it’s quite a difference.

      • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Good God I didn’t even realize that it would’ve easily taken more than a day to ship the child, that’s horrifying

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t understand. That seems impossible. The kid is shipped with several liters of water inside the box? And they just poop and pee in there?? And what kid would agree to that? It makes no sense. I feel like there must be more to this story.