• ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Obamacare was a compromise because single payer didn’t have the votes. If you think single payer was happening at any point in the last generation, I have a bridge to sell you.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Obamacare was a compromise between sucking the insurance companies dicks and fondling their balls while you suck their dicks.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Hate it all you want, but millions of people have gotten healthcare they otherwise wouldn’t have been able to. That’s just an objective fact.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Those people always could have purchased health insurance. The difference after Obamacare was they would be penalized if they didn’t. That’s just an objective fact.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Obamacare subsidizes healthcare specifically for people who couldn’t afford it before. The only people it penalized were rich people who refused to get healthcare. The fee was waived for most.

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              The only people, huh? As someone at the lower end of middle class, my premiums doubled every year for the first 4 years of Obamacare. When it got to $800 a month I cancelled it and took the penalty instead. Fuck off with your propaganda and lies.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Democracy is based on compromise. You can’t always get exactly what you want. Sometimes getting a small improvement is better than stagnation.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Why do Democrats have to compromise with Republicans but Republicans never have to compromise with Democrats?

          Why must they work with the party that has shifted towards fascism? Why must they compromise on half baked laws that don’t do the things people wanted, but corporations got what they demanded?

          Why do the Democrats work with fascists while refusing to stand up for the good of the country?

          And then their sycophants will tell you that it’s a normal thing to give the people who want to bring back American laws from the 1950s what they want, and you’re a idealist fool if you think we should advocate for good laws.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            The best to all of that is Democrats generally operate on good faith and Republicans don’t. It is easy to hold your ground if you don’t care who it hurts.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            If they didn’t compromise, being gay or trans would be illegal, abortion would be banned nationally, and only white Christian men would vote.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Romney may have signed it, but keep in mind Massachusetts is a blue state and the state Senate at that time had 35 Dem seats and only 5 Republican. It was a bipartisan bill, but mostly Democrat.

        Continuing with the status quo would have left millions without health insurance, including many with pre-existing conditions who desperately needed it. It wasn’t perfect, but it was an improvement.

        • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It was written by the heritage foundation, it was the best way to maximize profits for the health insurance industry.

          Yeah my life is so much better now that i have to pay a copay on top of my premiums instead of not having insurance and just having a regular old pay at the end of a visit. And Oh wow, I get a free flu shot and checkup once a year for my $5,000 a year in premiums. Oh and if i have a major health emergency i van declare bankruptcy on the $15000 deductible instead of declaring bankruptcy on the full cost of the surgery. Neat!

          There’s a reason republicans never repealed obamacare, because it makes the health insurance companies too much money.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            The idea that Romneycare was written by the Heritage Foundation is a myth repeated based on the Michael Moore documentary Sicko. It’s not true.

            https://prospect.org/2014/01/03/no-obamacare-republican-proposal/

            Let’s say you didn’t have insurance and were just counting on paying out of pocket. You are just living your life and BAM, you have a massive heart attack. Turns out you had an undiagnosed heart defect and there is nothing that could have prevented it or predicted it. You’re taken by ambulance to the hospital where you have open heart surgery and where you stay for weeks to recover. You get a huge bill that you can’t pay. What happens?

            The doctors and nurses did a lot of work to keep you alive and they deserve to get paid. The hospital has to keep the lights on. You filing for bankruptcy doesn’t change this. That is why everyone needs to have insurance. This kind of thing can happen to anyone at any time. As a society we can’t just let people die if they can’t afford treatment. Even if you take for-profit companies out of the equation, the whole system collapses with millions of people unable to pay.

            That is why everyone has to pay premiums. Part of that payment is for vaccinations and check ups, but part of it is coverage in case catastrophic shit happens. Healthy people get the least back out of the system, but nobody knows if they will still be healthy tomorrow. The bigger the pool of healthy people paying into the system, the less each person needs to pay to cover the people whose luck ran out.

            • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Oh wow well yeah if it’s literally impossible for a country to provide healthcare then yeah i guess obamacare is literally the only plan that will ever work

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Which is why it’s not an accomplishment for dems. Even with that brief super majority the best they could do is copy republicans plans. Which is also why the GOP can’t make any legislation to replace it as it’s already their plan.

      Which then gets back to the point of the post

      Edit, because people still don’t understand they based it on Romneycare

      https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/romneycare-vs-obamacare-key-similarities-differences/

      https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/10/23/451200436/mitt-romney-finally-takes-credit-for-obamacare

      https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2010/apr/01/barack-obama/obama-says-heritage-foundation-source-health-excha/

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        That is so wrong it is astounding. If the ACA is the GOP plan, why did they try and repeal it over 70 times?

        The Republican plan is for the poor to die because they believe in social eugenics.

        • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s literally Romneycare with a few minor tweaks.

          If the ACA is the GOP plan, why did they try and repeal it over 70 times?

          The Republican plan is for the poor to die because they believe in social eugenics.

          They keep trying because they want to break the government and kill people.

            • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              Romneycare was also based on the heritage foundation plan for insurance. So again it’s still the dems only implementing a republican plan.

              Also Romney didn’t sign it which is one reason it’s hilarious it got his name and he’s proud of it.

                • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Obama told host Matt Lauer that “when you actually look at the bill itself, it incorporates all sorts of Republican ideas. I mean a lot of commentators have said this is sort of similar to the bill that Mitt Romney, the Republican governor and now presidential candidate, passed in Massachusetts. A lot of the ideas in terms of the exchange, just being able to pool and improve the purchasing power of individuals in the insurance market, that originated from the Heritage Foundation. …”

                  It’s not a myth but sure keep saying it ignoring all the facts in front of you

                  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    You’re proving my point. The idea of pooling the purchasing power of individuals is the only part that came from the Heritage Foundation and it’s not like that is an original or new idea. That is what Social Security is based on. The rest is just Obama trying to give Republicans reasons not to hate the plan.