I don’t see what there is to acknowledge here? The argument is semantics, we’re saying the exact same ultimate thing in terms of outcomes. Every point I’ve made about AI remains the same. These people still remain bad at creating because they do not practice and improve due to their lack of “talent” as you put it, I feel that I put in the much friendlier terms by saying it is lack of practice due to motivation and I very much dislike this “talent” shit because it feels like bioessentialism.

It doesn’t matter which wording is used here either way, the outcome is literally the same, a bunch of hacks being given AI doesn’t produce good content. The people with the “talent” to improve are already producing content and improving their skills without it.