White “leftists” immediately turn into DNC propagandists the second you speak ill of Ziohran Copdani. Completely indistinguishable from the genocide-loving Kamala libs of November 2024. They slobbered over his unachievable “pledges” and “promises” and now that it isn’t happening all they can do is resort to gaslighting about how “nobody ever said he was actually going to do anything” and going “umm sweaty he’s just a mayor why do you care so much?”

Oh I guess he put in a bunch of bike lanes though lmao. Mission accomplished.

White “leftists” are the most intellectually dishonest people to ever walk the earth. And morally dishonest too of course, but that’s another discussion.

“The rules to the game I made up say I win you lose, sweaty. You have no legal basis ”

Here’s to hoping he gets his 45-minute TV spotlight

“””your””” “””work”””

That portrait should be an emoji. :killed:

Increasing the maximum military entry age until your entire Army is composed of decrepit Punic War veterans is a time-honored Hitlerian tradition

Whenever a cracker starts yapping about “feeling unsafe” because of the homeless/RVs/drug users or whatever I just ask them what these people have done to them. Like specifically, name one thing they have actually done that negatively impacted you.

99/100 times it’s either a nazi dogwhistle a la “neighborhood character” or some generic pearl-clutching about “safety”

1/100 times it’s the most made up bullshit I’ve ever heard

@Bay area gaohuas who think their cracker buddies won’t turn the guns on them after they successfully get the uppity blacks and homeless shipped off to the camps

Is this legal?

Wrong question.

Will Sam Altman be punished for this?

That is the question, and the answer is no.

Just think of all the sob stories “journalists” are going to shove down our throats

Can’t wait to finance my new $39,000 spy router with a 15 month lead time on production

Paid vacation where you execute doctors and newlyweds for fun

Wonder who the seller on Alibaba you can get the exact same thing for $0.1 is

Not as bad, but still, there are premises here that rely on the validity of other premises that cannot be confirmed, and conclusions that don’t necessarily follow from them.

I think this post is basically “he might have ejected”, or, “he most likely ejected because the aircraft was damaged.” Anybody can see that it was damaged, that the pilot most likely ejected is speculation not analysis. Nothing wrong with that but it’s written in an analytic tone. Why is it most likely? It’s not as if landing a damaged plane is an unheard of occurrence. The likelihood depends on variables we will likely never know. Yes it’s possible, but people don’t need to read a paragraph of fluff to know that.

Maybe not but what if I asserted that it was possible in a matter-of-fact tone and mixed in lightning emojis?

I’m a civil aviation guy and know next to nothing about military aviation but it’s still fun to see the extremely aviation-illiterate garbage vomiting out the mouths of self-appointed analysts like a waterfall.

If there was a bingo card for these accounts the free space would be “assuming FR24 is an all-knowing platform that includes 100% accurate data for every plane everywhere”

Now is the age of unverified bullshit from shitter complemented by a vibes-based “analysis” stretched so thin it wraps around the world 80 times

I still remember right after the Kirkening when these shitter types were posting paranoid conspiracies about a random private jet that dropped off FR24 for a few minutes over an extremely remote area “illegally turning off its radar” whatever that was supposed to mean.

Logic dictates that, because even if the damage didn’t directly cause the plane to crash due to severe structural damage or damage to the avionics, engine, or pilot himself, the problem would still affect the aircraft’s response, control, and even the landing gear. Landing with such damage poses a significant risk, so the pilot most likely ejected.

What is this even supposed to mean? “The damage to the aircraft damaged the aircraft.” Amazing how it took an entire paragraph to say basically nothing at all. This might be the most generic conjecture ever made, was more than five seconds of thought put into it?

I guess it’s still better than the accounts that go from incident to incident posting extremely detailed and extremely wrong speculation that nobody ever talks about again from the next day onwards, but we are supposed to take them seriously again the next time around like an ace attorney witness.

Make-work program

Don’t siege Tehran, take it immediately

everything is international for somebody

Seems obvious on the face of it, and if that wasn’t enough even a cursory look at the history of scouting - just read what Baden-Powell wrote about it himself - would reveal it for what it is. And yet mentioning this to certain white “leftists” causes incredible levels of offense as if I’m personally destroying their childhood.

“But but but it’s just a fun outdoorsy program and all the flag stuff was just on the side!” Funny statement because former members of the hitler youth said the exact same thing almost word-for-word. Apparently it’s not indoctrination unless you’re being tied down to a chair and forced to watch Mel Gibson’s The Patriot on loop for 250 hours.