Wonder who the seller on Alibaba you can get the exact same thing for $0.1 is

Not as bad, but still, there are premises here that rely on the validity of other premises that cannot be confirmed, and conclusions that don’t necessarily follow from them.

I think this post is basically “he might have ejected”, or, “he most likely ejected because the aircraft was damaged.” Anybody can see that it was damaged, that the pilot most likely ejected is speculation not analysis. Nothing wrong with that but it’s written in an analytic tone. Why is it most likely? It’s not as if landing a damaged plane is an unheard of occurrence. The likelihood depends on variables we will likely never know. Yes it’s possible, but people don’t need to read a paragraph of fluff to know that.

Maybe not but what if I asserted that it was possible in a matter-of-fact tone and mixed in lightning emojis?

I’m a civil aviation guy and know next to nothing about military aviation but it’s still fun to see the extremely aviation-illiterate garbage vomiting out the mouths of self-appointed analysts like a waterfall.

If there was a bingo card for these accounts the free space would be “assuming FR24 is an all-knowing platform that includes 100% accurate data for every plane everywhere”

Now is the age of unverified bullshit from shitter complemented by a vibes-based “analysis” stretched so thin it wraps around the world 80 times

I still remember right after the Kirkening when these shitter types were posting paranoid conspiracies about a random private jet that dropped off FR24 for a few minutes over an extremely remote area “illegally turning off its radar” whatever that was supposed to mean.

Logic dictates that, because even if the damage didn’t directly cause the plane to crash due to severe structural damage or damage to the avionics, engine, or pilot himself, the problem would still affect the aircraft’s response, control, and even the landing gear. Landing with such damage poses a significant risk, so the pilot most likely ejected.

What is this even supposed to mean? “The damage to the aircraft damaged the aircraft.” Amazing how it took an entire paragraph to say basically nothing at all. This might be the most generic conjecture ever made, was more than five seconds of thought put into it?

I guess it’s still better than the accounts that go from incident to incident posting extremely detailed and extremely wrong speculation that nobody ever talks about again from the next day onwards, but we are supposed to take them seriously again the next time around like an ace attorney witness.

Make-work program

Don’t siege Tehran, take it immediately

everything is international for somebody

Seems obvious on the face of it, and if that wasn’t enough even a cursory look at the history of scouting - just read what Baden-Powell wrote about it himself - would reveal it for what it is. And yet mentioning this to certain white “leftists” causes incredible levels of offense as if I’m personally destroying their childhood.

“But but but it’s just a fun outdoorsy program and all the flag stuff was just on the side!” Funny statement because former members of the hitler youth said the exact same thing almost word-for-word. Apparently it’s not indoctrination unless you’re being tied down to a chair and forced to watch Mel Gibson’s The Patriot on loop for 250 hours.

Slave owner saying slavery is like owning an animal [compares the enslaved to animals to dehumanize both and justifies slavery, supports hierarchy of beings] vs. vegan saying owning an animal is like slavery [compares animals to the enslaved to humanize both, condemns slavery and hierarchy]

: Hur durr these are the same thing!!!

Redditors love their bad faith condescension with black people props, not worth engaging with because 99% of their comments can just be translated to “Sieg Heil”

I’m in such good shape that I’ve bounced around to the other side of the curve and now going to the gym gets me out of shape

but instead the moment will be smothered in dread.

Trump will declare victory and the hogs will mindlessly celebrate

High-level intellectual discussion taking place in the replies:

Being dead is a real fickle, have they tried not joining a genocidal military?

“Where is the evidence?”

“Asking for evidence is cultural genocide.”

If Hitler had stuck to just killing nonwhites liberals would be calling Nazi Germany a “flawed democracy”

they were innocent smol beans who didn’t know what they were doing!

“Uhh I didn’t know the military was for killing people” who tf do these pricks think they’re fooling?

poverty draft

Funny how this same sympathy isn’t extended to robbers and thieves who kill far less people

“Uhh look he was just a kid once” yeah so was everyone who has ever lived and ever will live, who cares?

“Uhh but he did community service” yeah the white supremacist death squad member? Remind me why I should care. What if Hitler did trash cleanup as a kid?

Gotta wonder what “helping homeless youth” meant considering he jumped straight from that to murdering brown children. “You can’t kill our combatants after we bomb your country, that’s terrorism!”

lol @ bringing up him being in boy scouts as if I should care what this dipshit did before getting owned. He killed 200 kids and if Iran hadn’t stopped him he’d have killed 200 more.

I hope it was long, I hope he had time to piss and shit himself before it was over.

Hope this doesn’t start another , the only thing the resident crackers here love more than whitewashing war criminals is Ziohran Copdani.

A real “Der Sturmer article memorializing dead concentration camp guards with childhood Hitlerjugend photos” moment

Womp womp. Wonder if there are community service opportunities in hell