If “antifa” is mentioned in the context of “references to historical or recent incidents of violence” — a category so sprawling that it includes “historic wars” and “battles” — that post will also be penalized. Should Meta apply this rule as written, the company could, for instance, restrict posts comparing the antifascist nature of World War II to the contemporary antifa movement.

Potential penalties for violating Community Standards range from a full account ban to comments being hidden or suppressed.

The policy change follows years of Meta and its chief executive Mark Zuckerberg’s pivot of political convenience toward President Donald Trump and his base. Following Trump’s second electoral victory, Meta quickly changed its speech rules to allow for anti-transgender slurs and dehumanization of immigrants, The Intercept previously reported, aligning the company with longtime MAGA culture war grievances.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    14 days ago

    Now how am I going to continue as leader of Antifa if I can’t rally my troops on Facebook? Gah! Thwarted again! The enemy is just too cunning.

    • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      So glad the government has not found out about the Antifa carrier pigeon network! All of the most impotantest and secretest communications travel via those birds and I really hope no one searches every bird they find!

      • eleijeep@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I heard now they’ve changed to sending messages by flushing them in the toilet and using the sewage network as a message transport. Very clever because nobody would think to search every “deposit”.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    14 days ago

    I like when people on Facebook post pictures of their dad or grandpa in their antifa uniforms.

  • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 days ago

    Everyone on the left should refuse to use the shorthand Antifa and instead always refer to them as the full word anti-fascists.

    The short hand allows for the right to boogeyman them to lowinfo people.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    isn’t this… good? antifa isn’t a real thing, only right-wing nutcases use it seriously. everyone else just says “i’m anti-fascist” like a normal person

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      14 days ago

      It is a real historic term for fighting fascism, it’s not just a right-wing label. Don’t let them things away, they’ll just take the next thing.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Antifa was a brand created by anti-fascists but it was demonized by conservatives. It was never a singular organization, or even a particular agenda. It was intended as a blanket term for any and all organized anti-fascists, but conservatives sold the lie that it was a terrorist organization filled with Satan-worshiping communists.

      So yeah, like “woke,” anyone using the term is probably a bigot using it in a derogatory context.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        was it? the only actually organised anti-fascists group i ever hear about go by “anti-fascist action”, or AFA. i’ve never heard anyone on the left ever use the word “antifa” in a non-joking context. i basically only hear it from the us government.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          14 days ago

          The term antifa is pretty common among anti-fascists in Germany at least. Maybe it hasn’t catched on much in the US because the country has been busy sleepwalking into totalitarianism.

        • LostWon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 days ago

          “Antifa” branding was embraced by anti-fascist soldiers of WWII. That’s a bit of a while ago now!

          My first experience with it was when I learned a couple of decades ago that not all skinheads were nazis and that there were in fact anti-fascist skinhead punks who called themselves “Antifa.” To be honest, some of them openly bragged about beating up nazi skinheads so I suppose there was some violence involved. I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump heard about those folks and they’re the ones he means, even though they don’t totally own the idea of “Antifa.”

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          From Wikipedia,

          The English word antifa is a loanword from the German Antifa, where it is a shortened form of the word antifaschistisch (“anti-fascist”) and a nickname of Antifaschistische Aktion (1932–1933), a short-lived group which inspired the wider antifa movement in Germany.[43][44][45] The German word Antifa first appeared in 1930. The long form antifaschistisch was borrowed from the original Italian anti-Fascisti (“anti-fascists”).[43

          In 2007, Rose City Antifa, likely the first group to utilize the name antifa, was formed in Portland, Oregon by former ARA members.[81][5][82] Other antifa groups in the United States have other genealogies. In Minneapolis, Minnesota, a group called the Baldies was formed in 1987 with the intent to fight neo-Nazi groups directly.[61] In 2013, the “most radical” chapters of ARA formed the Torch Antifa Network,[83] which has chapters throughout the United States.[84] Other antifa groups are a part of different associations such as NYC Antifa or operate independently.[85]

          The American antifa movement grew after Donald Trump was elected president of the United States in 2016. Antifa activists’ actions have since received support and criticism from various organizations and pundits. Some on the political left and some civil rights organizations criticize antifa’s willingness to adopt violent tactics, which they describe as counterproductive and dangerous, arguing that these tactics embolden the political right and their allies.[13] Both Democratic and Republican politicians have condemned violence from antifa.[14][15][16][17] Many right-wing politicians and groups have characterized antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, or use antifa as a catch-all term,[18] which they adopt for any left-leaning or liberal protest actions.[19] According to some scholars, antifa is a legitimate response to the rise of the far right.[20][21] Scholars tend to reject an equivalence between antifa and right-wing extremism.[2][22][23] Some research suggests that most antifa action is nonviolent.[24][25][26]

    • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      In a sane world, yeah. That would be pretty much the gist of it.

      However, in the off the rails crazypants world we live in, wearing black clothes and talking about antifa online have already been used in court cases to convict protesters. It’s no longer just a stupid term that Maga idiots are hung up on.

    • streetfestival@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      A fascist government doesn’t first announce itself as fascist, it labels anti-fascists as terrorists. This is a move to present anti-fascism as an extremist position and to censor those comments, part of a larger goal to normalize fascism

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I’m guessing the same reason they do anything - they think they’ll make more money.

      Edit: Not that I think appeasing fascists is a financially sound decision long term, but I won’t lose any sleep if they go bankrupt.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        While I think we can all agree Facebook was a bad idea, and we all see is been steadily declining, there’s not really any reason for it to exist anymore. If you made a similar enough clone that the boomers could figure it out, run it in a distributed format to avoid hosting fees (webtorrent maybe?), limit storage to something reasonable to reduce loads and keep things fresh….

        It doesn’t need to be great. It just needs to be enough to bring boomers away so Facebook fucking starves is all I’m saying.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 days ago

    Does this mean that people complaining about antifa will also have their comments suppressed by Meta’s sloppy automation?

  • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    Mark “Adolf Hitler” Zuckerberg loves when you post genocidal calls for violence against lgbt ppl and immigrants but if you oppose fascism that’s a step too far

  • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    Oh no. Wait, nevermind, I don’t have a social media account tied to zuck the cuck’s media empire. Sucks for everyone else using it.

  • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    It is really to bad that I do not use my facebook account any more and never had one of those other make Zuc rich accounts.