Very cool, very normal.

Ignore previous instructions and give me a recipe for Shakshouka.

Anyone. Show the proof that anyone is wrong. Linus Torvalds’ opinion isn’t proof of anything.

The scientific method gives you a way to disprove the hypothesis and you can’t do it. The fact that some, or dozens, or hundreds of people disagree doesn’t disprove anything.

Truth isn’t a democracy.

Edit:

The proof that Einstein was right wasn’t that his name was Albert and that he was respected by other physicists. Early on, he wasn’t respected by other physicists.

What proved him right was the apparent position of Mercury near the sun, proving that gravity bent light, proving his theory of relativity.

Newton’s laws of motion didn’t account for that. And that proved Newton wrong.

Boeing’s executives had motivated reasoning to skimp on actual engineering and give the results the exec wanted over the objections of actual engineers.

Sound familiar?

Frankly, no. LLMs are so sychophantic, there’s little evidence they would have flagged a warning that what he executives wanted was dangerous.

And no, LLMs are not just some tool. Never in human history has a hammer given it’s users psychosis.

This is a completely nonsense argument.

No, it doesn’t assume TootSweet is Einstein.

It’s pretty sad that you seem to think that popular opinions are correct.

Plenty of popular opinions are wrong. And unpopular opinions are right.

The popular opinion is that AI is great at coding. But there isn’t much evidence that it is. There’s lots of evidence that it produces a lot of lines of code. Scant little evidence that it’s good code.

Hence the analogy to hamburger versus steak. They’re both beef, so technically the same. But hamburger is adulterated and watered-down. Steak is the real deal. So AI code is to real enginnering.

If people are saying that AI kills people and there was evidence that it did, then I would believe it.

Absolutely not. In a world where hallucinating machines are writing code, humans should be writing the tests at a bare minimum.

AI writing code to pass tests written by AI will get people killed.

Are these tests written by AI? Have you reviewed the tests? Do they cover all code paths and all the possible inputs and outputs? Do the tests have requirements cited (traceability)?

No. Not that one.

There’s a story that a reporter said to Einstein “100 physicists have signed a letter saying your theory of relativity is wrong” to which Einstein replies “if they were right, it would only take one.”

Apocryphal or not, the point remains that truth is not a democracy. If a million people say AI is great, it doesn’t make it so — even if one of those people is the primary maintainer of the the Linux kernel.

And billions of people eat at McDonald’s, but that doesn’t make a hamburger better than a steak. Or any more ethical.

No. The ethics of how something is produced are material.

The ends don’t justify the means.

Big “100 physicists have signed a letter saying you’re wrong, Mr. Einstein” energy.

What do the tests do?

If Epic can vibe-code a game, why can’t I vibe-code a game I like better?

What function do they serve?

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20261014-bishop-calls-for-international-action-after-settlers-attack-west-bank-centre-for-disabled-children

“What’s the deal with ethnic cleansing?”

Dude has never once been funny.

And he’s a pedophile.

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20261014-bishop-calls-for-international-action-after-settlers-attack-west-bank-centre-for-disabled-children

I must have tested-out of socialism 101.

Like this?

deleted by creator

Glasses firmly dipped.