- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- globalnews@lemmy.zip
- canada@lemmy.ca
- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- globalnews@lemmy.zip
- canada@lemmy.ca
cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/8336362
[Opinion] Visa-free visits to China are a risk for Canadians
[Op-ed by Irwin Cotler, international chair of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights; and Mehmet Tohti is the executive director of the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project.]
China’s new visa-free policy for Canadians may appear to signal openness. In reality, it exposes Canadians to risks our government has found difficult to mitigate.
Consider Huseyin Celil, a Canadian citizen illegally detained in China for two decades.
Mr. Celil, a peaceful advocate for the rights of the Uyghur people, travelled to Uzbekistan in 2006, where he was detained and forcibly transferred to China. There, he was convicted on baseless “terrorism” charges in a sham trial condemned by Canada.
China has continued to refuse to recognize Mr. Celil’s Canadian citizenship, thereby denying him the basic protections owed to him under international law, including consular access. His family in Canada has been without meaningful communication or reliable information about his condition for almost two decades. Their uncertainty is continuing; their suffering is immeasurable.
His case is an enduring injustice and test of Canada’s capacity to protect its citizens abroad.
…
It exposes a contradiction: How can a state that denies a Canadian citizen his rights simultaneously claim to welcome Canadians?
…
For those engaged in human rights advocacy, political activity, or public criticism of the Chinese Communist Party, this [visa-free visits to China] creates a major vulnerability at the border. They may face increased risks of refusal of entry, disappearance or imprisonment.
For many Canadians in these diaspora communities, the question is no longer “Can I travel?” but “Will I be safe if I do – and will my country help me if I am not?” This risk is not confined to diaspora communities. If Canadian citizenship can be ignored in Mr. Celil’s case, it can be ignored in others’.
When a foreign state can detain a Canadian with impunity and deny their Canadian citizenship, the protection that citizenship is meant to guarantee erodes for everyone.
…
The new visa-free policy intersects with a broader pattern of surveillance, intimidation and foreign interference. The Foreign Interference Commission concluded that **China “stands out as the most persistent and sophisticated foreign interference threat to Canada.” **Beijing targets democratic institutions, politicians, and the diaspora through intelligence services to advance its interests and manipulate Canadian politics. The PRC views Canada as a high-priority target, not only for foreign interference, but transnational repression, in violation of Canadian sovereignty and security.
…
Twenty years after Mr. Celil’s abduction, we call on the government of Canada to raise his case and to:
- Engage in high-level diplomatic representations to seek proof of life.
- As the home country, provide the necessary diplomatic and consular assistance and remedy. We likewise call on China, as the host country, to honour its obligations for that purpose.
- Restore family contact, including at least one phone call with his wife and children in Canada with all deliberate speed.
- Renew efforts to secure his release and reunite him with his family here.
These are not extraordinary demands. They are the minimum obligations owed to any Canadian citizen.
…
When a foreign state can detain a Canadian with impunity and deny their Canadian citizenship, the protection that citizenship is meant to guarantee erodes for everyone
hmm yes, that does sound troubling.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/24/canadian-mother-detention-warns-immigrants
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/canadian-man-stuck-ice-detention-centre-9.7113431
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-ice-custody-canadians-two-toddlers-texas/
It is tolerable when burgers do it.
Why do I get the impression that they’re “yadda yadda yadda”-ing a lot of important details in this man’s arrest and trial.
I didn’t look particularly in depth but from some brief internet searching:
In March 2006, while visiting Uzbekistan with his wife, Celil was detained by Uzbek police.
Uzbek authorities, acting on a request from China and citing an Interpol notice, identified him as Guler Dilaver, a name on watchlists for alleged terrorist activity in Kyrgyzstan.
Despite Canadian diplomatic objections, he was transferred to China.
Chinese courts tried him in August 2006 on charges of “terrorist activities and plotting to split the country,” linking him to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM).
He received a life sentence. Appeals reduced an initial death sentence, but the conviction stands.
Also on the refusing Canadian diplomatic assistance I can speak on that a bit, it appears he was holding dual nationality (Canadian and Chinese) for one reason or another. China does not recognise dual nationality, and thus treats anyone who holds a Chinese nationality as entirely Chinese under the law.
Of course globonorth is going to support their separatists.





