(credit to RomCom1989 for the title)
Image is of an Iranian soldier exulting in the launch of a ballistic missile aimed towards the imperialists.
short summary this week: US doing pretty bad and Iran doing pretty good all things considered, Strait of Hormuz is closed and will almost certainly remain so until the end of the war, Trump has no idea what to do, global economic crisis from strait closure is basically guaranteed at this point but who will ultimately benefit most and who will ultimately lose most is still up in the air.
longish summary is below in the spoiler tags
longish summary
While there are still major debates raging about how badly things are actually going right now and what the post-conflict map may look like, as we blaze past the two week mark on this conflict, it’s becoming ever more obvious to almost everybody involved that this war is not going according to plan, if there ever was one. US airstrikes are, from what I can best determine, still mostly done with relatively less powerful (but still very dangerous!) and much less plentiful standoff munitions launched from bombers, though certain border and coastal areas are being struck with more powerful and more plentiful short-range guided bombs. This indicates that Iranian air defense is still sufficiently functional throughout most of Iran that the kinds of true carpet bombing done against Korea and Vietnam in the past (and Gaza very recently) is still too risky, though their airspace is still very much under assault, as we appear to have images of small groups of Western fighters breaching relatively deep into the country. Under some kind of Iranian pressure (drones? missiles? speedboats?) one aircraft carrier has retreated to a thousand kilometers from Iran, hiding behind the mountains of Oman; the other is sitting in the Red Sea, rather pointedly out of range of Yemen. As such, the ranges that Western aircraft must travel to bombard Iran is increasing, which reduces their frequency and increases strain on maintenance and logistics in the medium and long term.
While there is tons to say about the current social, economic, and military state of Iran, I don’t think I have a reliable enough picture to give a good summary beyond “they aren’t close to defeat or regime change”. What has instead captured much of the world’s attention is the continuing blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which has inspired some of the most delusional statements I have seen so far in my life, which is sincerely a profound achievement. For those out of the loop: the strait is currently closed to all shipping except those going to very particular countries (I’ve seen China and Bangladesh mentioned, and apparently India is in the process of working something out and may succeed or fail). This is because most ships are not risking the trip due to the ~20 tankers and container ships that Iran has already struck and disabled in the strait and in the Persian Gulf. Additionally, the threat from Iran’s military to Navy ships is such that attempting to create a convoy to guide tankers through it is suicidal to both the Navy and merchant ships. Right now it cannot be done, and it very well might be the case that it could never be done, simply due to the combination of Iran’s naval forces (hundreds, perhaps thousands, of armed, specialized speedboats designed for exactly this purpose), their drones (in the tens of thousands), their torpedoes, and if all else fails, their naval mines.
The Western reaction to this has been so moronic that it has almost integer underflowed into being philosophical: what does it truly mean for a passage to be “closed”? Has Iran truly “closed” the strait, or is the risk of traversing it simply too high for these cowardly sailors (who, for some strange reason, seem to care about their “lives” and “families”)? How is it possible for Iran to have closed the strait if, according to the West, Iran’s military has been totally obliterated? All these questions and more plague the minds of those who cannot accept the now-proven fact that there are indeed military forces on this planet that the US Navy with all its aircraft carriers and destroyers and submarines cannot defeat; and one of those minds is, rather hilariously, Trump himself. His thrice-daily positive affirmations that Iran has been defeated are taking on an increasingly deranged and almost pitiable tone; the lamentations of a man who has finally found a situation where him merely stating that something is true is insufficient to change the situation one iota. Despite stating that some kind of naval compact or alliance is being established to protect shipping, every Western country so far - from the UK, to France, to Japan, to Australia - has publicly stated that they will not risk their ships to do so. All this as the continued blockade yet further guarantees a worldwide energy, production, transportation, and food crisis that will have major global ramifications for at least the rest of the decade and almost certainly beyond.
If the anti-imperialists play their cards right, the US could lose much from this crisis, and others, like China and Russia, could gain a great deal. To quote Nia Frome (co-founder of Red Sails): “An effective Marxist has to be enough of an accelerationist/pervert to treat the obviously bad things that are going to happen as the political opportunities they are.”
Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on the Zionists’ destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Biss is literally receiving AIPAC funding via J Street. Some of you have a deep seated love for cutting off your nose to spite your face. I’m sure if you asked him his position on Taiwan, it isn’t any better than Abughazaleh, either.
That’s why I said he was pretty awful. The outcome wasn’t great either way and domestically they don’t seem all that different.
Thankfully that phrase doesn’t apply to me because I vote for the Communists in my country.
It’s all so silly. If you (understandably) not like her,why not just…ignore the situation? Why do the anti electorialists,which I don’t even fundamentally disagree with, sometimes cheer on this stuff? Like oh, great! the NATO leftist lost!..to the pro Israel guy…
Ok, she’s a fake and a phony,fine,then why not just not give a shit about this? Instead let’s dunk on people you at least share some common principles,even if they’re naive, because what? Because you feel big and powerful dunking on the progressives? So,so silly to act like this is a victory in any sort of way. Are these people really the biggest enemies around? Really? Not the demonic nazistoid Republicans or the hollow democratic establishment AIPAC flesh puppets? It’s the people who you agree with, let’s say, 50% with instead of zero?
I’m not calling progressives the vanguard of revolution here,I’m just so skeeved by this tendency by the, let’s be honest,online left people (I doubt actual people who act in the real world care about getting some easy dunks on people who still care about elections) to act like some great wrong was righted when some person you disliked ate shit,even though they were,at least in the confines of the situation they exist,the less bad choice as some great victory when in reality nothing changed,things still are awful,but they got to feel big for a second for dunking on naive,but well intentioned people. It’s all so childish.
No Fun Allowed
More liberal Zionists!
if shitposting on hexbear could get people elected or prevent them from being elected i’m going to be honest i don’t think america would be at war with iran right now
It’s not so much about material effects on the election as it is about the tone we are setting for our community.
Making jokes like this about electoralism in the Democratic party is the essence of what this place has always been, before it even become hexbear. Getting mad at people for blowing off steam with sarcastic jokes about people who aren’t really leftists just seems like a waste of time.
Ive been a part of this community for almost 10 years now. I have plenty of knowledge about the past and a fair amount of investment in its future.
It sucks to come online and have it be layers of irony and layers of “irony”. I would really like to be proud of the online space I am part of, but due to the unserious attitudes that prevail here, I would never refer someone I know IRL here. Unfortunately, everywhere else on the internet is worse.
Just like Iran and Russia are not leftist projects, but are useful to building socialism in 2026, there are certain electoral movements that are worthy of analysis about their usefulness to a left movement. For some reason that just goes out the window because “read settlers” or something I guess.
Where would you like to place the line? If we can’t make fun of liberal Democrats, can we make fun of Republicans? Should we stop making fun of the White House, or the State Department?
Fun derived from what? This is pure schadenfreude that bellies no real win on your side. Let me clarify,I’m not pro Kat,hell I’m not even American,I just personally find this dunking childish. It’s clearly just reveling in the seemingly aborted progressive movement never getting off of the ground. And if they were the main obstacle to revolution in America, that’d be great!
Except they aren’t,and instead there’s a million worse existing ghouls who got a W. Wow,the AIPAC guy btfo’d the progressive neocon! That’s great,I’m glad you’re having fun,but I’m also at liberty to think dunking on people who you could bring over to your side,who clearly give a shit,and are mouldable into something workable is peak childishness. I’m not demanding you stop,I’m just expressing how this type of “fun” looks to me. Idc that she lost,but the people who gave a shit,could,with the right education and motivation actually do good. Now they ate shit, probably got demoralized or whatever.
Ok,you might think, they’re ripe for radicalization! Bzzt! Wrong! Because they’re American,they follow vibes more than actual conviction,they go online,see people to their left reveling in a loss they might actually a give a shit about and they check out. And Bam! you’ve done nothing but create bad blood where there didn’t need to be bad blood just to style on some fools that haven’t progressed as far in the journey to the left as far as you have, the saint of leftism,who was birthed out of an AK-47,suckled on the teat of Lenin and who’s first word spoken was “proletariat”. You,oh saintly internationalist, who’s first book read was Das Kapital and who’s first word written was calling someone a lib!
I apologize for the essay,which is not even wholly aimed at Hexbear specifically. I obviously don’t think this place is some secret haunt for electorialists who would get turned off by some comments. I completely understand that in the grand scheme of things, some snarky comments matter as much as her losing. It sort of just came out because it was something I had on my mind for a while. The paragraph above wasn’t aimed at you,to be clear,it was more of a subtweet at a certain type of person. I just find this infighting so empty and useless,why can’t people just leave well enough be?
Sometimes people make jokes about things they have absolutely no control over. This is human nature. Scolding others about how they use jokes to cope with reality doesn’t really make any sense.
Well,I think it goes both ways,no? Sometimes people scold others about things they themselves have no control over. Though I agree,both actions have no real impact or consequence,I was merely expressing something I had on my mind for a while. And again,I just think it’s silly,it’s not indicative of anything more than a minor annoyance,I don’t dislike people who joke about it.
Serious questions. Where does someone draw the line? What’s the difference between making fun of Kamala Harris for losing to Trump and making fun of this? Or Graham Platner? Like, I understand that you should critically support your friends, allies, etc who are on your side but who you may not agree with 100%. There’s always been a lot of disagreement in any communist party. There’s lots of disagreement on Hexbear and Lemmygrad. To a certain extent, that’s healthy. But when someone clams to be on your side but keeps expressing opinions that go against your principles, when do they stop being ‘well intentioned’ and stop being someone you should support? When does the argument just becomes the same liberal incrementalism/lesser evilism?
I don’t know that much about Kat Abughazaleh so I’m not necessarily talking about them specifically. This is a more general question that has been kicking around in my head in discussions of Ali Khamenei and more pro-nuclear politicians that were/are in his orbit. Many liberals have been cheering his demise without considering his replacement may actually be ‘worse’ on the issues they claim to care about, making him the lesser evil in that situation.
harris was a nationwide campaign
platner was a blackwater merc and had a nazi tattoo, drawing a line in the sand there is really easy
ideally we wouldn’t have to care about electoral races we can’t vote in.
Sure, the line was pretty clear with Platner. They weren’t the best example in severity, I suppose. But they still claim to be some sort of socialist or progressive is what I was getting at and many people still argue that his domestic policy is likely better than his opponents. I agree it’s kind of a waste of brain space to pay attention to if you can’t affect the outcome, like the OP comment said people can just ignore it. I’m just kind of curious how people approach their critical support in different circumstances. The comment about community vibe/tone make sense to me.
i think you can’t take nazis at their word. no support at all, not even critical. the party structure and whoever helped him file shouldn’t put voters in the position to have to even consider someone like him, regardless of his being willing to lie about supporting good things.
Well,I didn’t say support,I said don’t create bad blood where there doesn’t need to be bad blood
I absolutely agree progressive voters,as they are,are absolutely not in “our” camp However,my point is that they could be in the future. I’m talking mainly about door knockers or callers and such,or even someone who takes time out of their day to convince those they know to vote for a candidate like this. These are people who could,if they woke up from their electorialist stupor, actually do good,they clearly show a commitment to actually doing something in the real world. My argument is that it’s pointless and self congratulating to dunk on them when they don’t attack you just to make yourself feel better. My point of view is that you’ll recruit from these people when they finally see that electorialism and incrementalism is a dead end. If that is the case,why veer into dunking on them when they eat shit like you eat shit everyday? They’re as powerless as you are. Some people like to couch their self congratulatory dunks as actual principled critique,that’s what I’m railing against.
Saying her foreign policy is dogshit wrapped in catshit wrapped with horseshit with a side of rat shit with sprinkles of guano on top is a valid criticism,but she is anti ice and decidedly anti Israel. That doesn’t mean you have to vote for her or even voice support for her ,but why rejoice when she loses to someone worse? Catharsis? That’s fine,I guess,I understand people need to let their resentment out,I’m just pointing out that to me at least,it’s a hollow and empty schadenfreude because it’s not like she lost to someone with actual principles,she lost to a pro-Israel guy.
For me,at least, progressives are one tier above the garden variety lib in salvageability. And they share some common principles. It’s perfectly fine if you don’t like them,but I just hate this idea that you’re actually doing this incredibly biting critique when you dunk on them,when in reality you’re just engaging in schadenfreude. I would be much less bothered if people were honest about that. There’s so many bigger demons out there,why pass the time ragging on people who ar least have some commonalities with you? Of course,if they attack first,it’s open season,no doubts about it,I’m just saying that if you don’t offer an alternative, starting shit doesn’t do anything but make you feel better about yourself.
Have people here been rooting for her to lose or something? I think everyone correctly pointing out the obvious issues with candidates doesn’t mean they think those candidates aren’t the best of the terrible lineups running against them. I usually don’t see people here expressing much interest in who wins or loses as much as their issues with people presenting themselves as leftists while having antithetical positions. people eat it up so it is important to critique that from the left.
She has the same Western anarcholiberal brianworms as a bunch of Americans. She went on the Majority Report and said that she backs self-determination for Ukraine and Taiwan, views that are tinted based on her experience as an Palestinian American plus hiring a terrible foreign policy advisor that I believe she fired after that interview. She got rightly torn a new one for it and a bunch of the American left dropped their support for her, but she is also better than Biss on most issues, and she isn’t backed by the liberal AIPAC fronts like J Street. This is maybe the first time I’ve seen her stupid Taiwan position talked about in the news mega, but I might have missed some comments.
why was she even talking about any of this? where is the organization, or the message discipline? did she not see how Z won? why was she giving lectures on nerd shit, and not talking about affordability, or, at most, the genocide?
I didn’t bother to watch the Majority Report interview, I assume it came up as a foreign policy topic in some form. I’m not surprised she has no message discipline, she’s a 26 year old journalist and poster who isn’t part of any leftist organization or party, not even the DSA. She’s probably used to just shooting out takes without having to think about it too much. Her position is dumb and she deserves the criticism, but I would rather having to teach a 26-year old, seemingly otherwise well-intentioned dummy who isn’t funded by J Street why those two positions are stupid than trying to fight a guy that strikes me as an Obama-type.
sure.
i’d too rather have more votes than fewer votes, and obviously it takes all kinds, and if wannabe privileged nerd shit is what takes us over the line so be it, and if she won i’d defend her here, like i do every succdem, but, all of that to say, i don’t dig the vibe and am not surprised at the result. hopefully there can be some lesson here, for someone.
right that’s the only commentary I’ve seen on her here. it seems like you are implying that hexbear users are desiring her to lose because of these critiques and I haven’t seen that myself but maybe I am misunderstanding you
We are in a comment chain that started on with someone celebrating her losing.
ah I see, yeah I don’t really read it that way. I felt like OP was just kind of citing an in-joke / reference that ultra libs like us hexbearians would get just as a riff on the news of her loss as many of us do here. if the joke didn’t land that is fine but OP acknowledged that the person who won sucks, its not like the comment was “good she deserved it” or something. there is certainly a base of insufferable NATO leftists that are seething and it is fine to point that out or joke about it imo
Seems like it was Biss’s opponent Fine who was receiving AIPAC funding. J Street may be jewish (and zionist, I don’t know), but it seems that J Street criticized AIPAC’s involvement
J Street is an AIPAC cutout, it was founded in the mid/late 2000s when AIPAC was starting to get more press and started earning a toxic reputation with the left wing of the Democratic party. Their role is to keep Democratic politicians onboard with keeping the money and guns flowing to Israel:
https://mondoweiss.net/2026/01/j-street-is-the-new-aipac-in-the-democratic-party/