(credit to RomCom1989 for the title)
Image is of an Iranian soldier exulting in the launch of a ballistic missile aimed towards the imperialists.
short summary this week: US doing pretty bad and Iran doing pretty good all things considered, Strait of Hormuz is closed and will almost certainly remain so until the end of the war, Trump has no idea what to do, global economic crisis from strait closure is basically guaranteed at this point but who will ultimately benefit most and who will ultimately lose most is still up in the air.
longish summary is below in the spoiler tags
longish summary
While there are still major debates raging about how badly things are actually going right now and what the post-conflict map may look like, as we blaze past the two week mark on this conflict, it’s becoming ever more obvious to almost everybody involved that this war is not going according to plan, if there ever was one. US airstrikes are, from what I can best determine, still mostly done with relatively less powerful (but still very dangerous!) and much less plentiful standoff munitions launched from bombers, though certain border and coastal areas are being struck with more powerful and more plentiful short-range guided bombs. This indicates that Iranian air defense is still sufficiently functional throughout most of Iran that the kinds of true carpet bombing done against Korea and Vietnam in the past (and Gaza very recently) is still too risky, though their airspace is still very much under assault, as we appear to have images of small groups of Western fighters breaching relatively deep into the country. Under some kind of Iranian pressure (drones? missiles? speedboats?) one aircraft carrier has retreated to a thousand kilometers from Iran, hiding behind the mountains of Oman; the other is sitting in the Red Sea, rather pointedly out of range of Yemen. As such, the ranges that Western aircraft must travel to bombard Iran is increasing, which reduces their frequency and increases strain on maintenance and logistics in the medium and long term.
While there is tons to say about the current social, economic, and military state of Iran, I don’t think I have a reliable enough picture to give a good summary beyond “they aren’t close to defeat or regime change”. What has instead captured much of the world’s attention is the continuing blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which has inspired some of the most delusional statements I have seen so far in my life, which is sincerely a profound achievement. For those out of the loop: the strait is currently closed to all shipping except those going to very particular countries (I’ve seen China and Bangladesh mentioned, and apparently India is in the process of working something out and may succeed or fail). This is because most ships are not risking the trip due to the ~20 tankers and container ships that Iran has already struck and disabled in the strait and in the Persian Gulf. Additionally, the threat from Iran’s military to Navy ships is such that attempting to create a convoy to guide tankers through it is suicidal to both the Navy and merchant ships. Right now it cannot be done, and it very well might be the case that it could never be done, simply due to the combination of Iran’s naval forces (hundreds, perhaps thousands, of armed, specialized speedboats designed for exactly this purpose), their drones (in the tens of thousands), their torpedoes, and if all else fails, their naval mines.
The Western reaction to this has been so moronic that it has almost integer underflowed into being philosophical: what does it truly mean for a passage to be “closed”? Has Iran truly “closed” the strait, or is the risk of traversing it simply too high for these cowardly sailors (who, for some strange reason, seem to care about their “lives” and “families”)? How is it possible for Iran to have closed the strait if, according to the West, Iran’s military has been totally obliterated? All these questions and more plague the minds of those who cannot accept the now-proven fact that there are indeed military forces on this planet that the US Navy with all its aircraft carriers and destroyers and submarines cannot defeat; and one of those minds is, rather hilariously, Trump himself. His thrice-daily positive affirmations that Iran has been defeated are taking on an increasingly deranged and almost pitiable tone; the lamentations of a man who has finally found a situation where him merely stating that something is true is insufficient to change the situation one iota. Despite stating that some kind of naval compact or alliance is being established to protect shipping, every Western country so far - from the UK, to France, to Japan, to Australia - has publicly stated that they will not risk their ships to do so. All this as the continued blockade yet further guarantees a worldwide energy, production, transportation, and food crisis that will have major global ramifications for at least the rest of the decade and almost certainly beyond.
If the anti-imperialists play their cards right, the US could lose much from this crisis, and others, like China and Russia, could gain a great deal. To quote Nia Frome (co-founder of Red Sails): “An effective Marxist has to be enough of an accelerationist/pervert to treat the obviously bad things that are going to happen as the political opportunities they are.”
Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on the Zionists’ destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Ive been a part of this community for almost 10 years now. I have plenty of knowledge about the past and a fair amount of investment in its future.
It sucks to come online and have it be layers of irony and layers of “irony”. I would really like to be proud of the online space I am part of, but due to the unserious attitudes that prevail here, I would never refer someone I know IRL here. Unfortunately, everywhere else on the internet is worse.
Just like Iran and Russia are not leftist projects, but are useful to building socialism in 2026, there are certain electoral movements that are worthy of analysis about their usefulness to a left movement. For some reason that just goes out the window because “read settlers” or something I guess.
Where would you like to place the line? If we can’t make fun of liberal Democrats, can we make fun of Republicans? Should we stop making fun of the White House, or the State Department?
IRL (and online to a lesser extent) I place the line at people who use the word “socialist” (or related) to describe themselves. To me that is demonstrating an intent to move beyond the liberal paradigm and into the “big kid club” with the rest of us.
Welcome Kat and her supporters as budding comrades, but if they want to roll with us any further it is time to contend with the socialist questions of the day. I think they should be grilled in good faith. Kat stammered out some bullshit as a nominal socialist and needs to be held to account for that, win or lose. Her supporters should watch carefully, and we should hope that Kat will correct her stances and earn better support in the future. They’ll have more to learn from us engaging in that way than us poking “liberal liberal liberal” at anyone to the right of Deng.
I am willing to put aside that Kat (and other western nominal socialists) may be disingenuous ladder-climbers who want an easy way to elevate their profile. That ought to be discussed, but I don’t think we should leap to that right away! We should engage with some charitability in order to play to the audience she brings; her flaws will become apparent when us more “senior socialists” offer constructive criticism (which she may or may not be responsive to).
I am also putting aside anti-electoralism. I think our approach should be to leverage conversations about electoral politics as an educational opportunity. Poking fun at any given opportunity isolates potential newcomers to the site and the global socialist movement instead of giving them the hooks to be pulled into the fold. If we pull them in with us, they will have a ton of oppouritunities to learn that lesson the same way so many of us have (taking a ton of L’s).
Kat isn’t that great of a socialist, but I think it is good when people think it is a cool and winning idea. We need to capitalize on that popularity and pull people in closer instead of turning them away or leaving them behind. Nobody likes to feel like they are being made fun of, and I think our community is wise enough to identify the parasocial nature of American celebrity politics and move accordingly.
None of that is incompatible with making fun of Kat. Particularly not here, a tiny lefty site that nobody cares about. There’s this strange disconnect between people making jokes among themselves and this unnecessary tone policing a minority engages in as if everything we say here is an Official Declaration. You are more than welcome to be stoked about the campaign, but you should have the ability to see other people making jokes and not feel personally attacked, or feel as though everyone making jokes hates Kat and her supporters.
I feel like this is a straw man of my point. I am advocating for tone-consciousness, not strict rules. Not everything posted is a strict declaration, but the overall tone communicates an general intention. If there were a balance between the jokes/irony and the engagement/analysis of a topic then I wouldnt be posting this. If I wanted pure enthusiastic engagement with a “socialish” electoral campaign, I’m sure there are plenty of other online spaces I could go to (le reddit, le beehaw idk), but there’s a reason I stay here.
You and I and other long time members of this community have that ability, but I know for a fact that others do not. This is especially true for the newcomers I am concerned with who haven’t developed our sense of irony. I am advocating that they get a chance to merge in to that rather than be repelled by it. I think our community is putting the brakes on development and has been below a healthy rate of growth for some time.