• SteveNashFan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 年前

    I’m over here with the 1,400-page book… shoutout to Tolkien making me emotional in the appendices:

    Tap for spoiler

    We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin’s son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter.

    And

    Tap for spoiler

    (1541) In this year 1 on March 1st came at last the Passing of King Elessar. It is said that the beds of Meriadoc and Peregrin were set beside the bed of the great king. Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf. And when that ship passed an end was come in Middle-earth of the Fellowship of the Ring.

  • TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    Let’s say you had to pay the TV $1/minute to watch LOTR. Is the extended cut worth $30-$50 more per movie than the theatrical cut?

    I wouldn’t pay the extra but I’m not the biggest fan. It’s been years so I don’t recall all the things the extended cut adds. Just curious what fans would say in this economy.

    • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 年前

      If I’m already spending ~$555 to watch the trilogy, I’d like the most bang for my buck, if I can afford it. But apparently I can’t even afford to watch the theatrical cut anymore. It figures. I knew it was coming eventually.

      • TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        Fair point. If you’re already spending $555 to watch a movie, what’s another $150 for all of it?

        I guess my thought was that if my time is worth money, would it be worth my extra time/money to watch the extra bits over say, attending to other aspects of my life? Does the extra footage really enhance the overall viewing pleasure? If I recall one of the scenes was a tree getting high with Gandalf? I don’t remember, it’s why I’m asking.

        • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 年前

          I never wanted those movies to end, so I was always happy with more. I always think of the scene with the creepy gatekeeper guy with the winning smile. All but removed from the theatrical cut.

          Edit: The Mouth of Sauron is what I was thinking of: https://youtu.be/To_RJ_mPNqM

    • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      Do you attribute monetary value to anything you do and is this the one worthwhile measure you use to decide what to do?

  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 年前

    Honestly I don’t remember watching the theatrical cut in the past 20 years, so don’t know what’s the difference. It’s just that the extended editions are the ones I know, and I deeply love

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 年前

    I’ll bite. What’s better about it? I rarely find longer cuts to be worthwhile. Editing is usually a form of enhancement. One of the hardest yet most significant improvements you can make as a writer is better editing. With all the work that goes into just a few minutes of film, there is a resistance to cutting anything. The best editors usually have no involvement in the creation and can condense and richen the intensity and flow of a film.

    • dontsayaword@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      The Theatrical Edition is arguably better paced, but the Extended Edition contains extra depth and plot points (eg. Sarumon’s death).

      The choice is subjective. IMO: If you were reading a fantastic novel, and it had a bonus chapter, would you read it? For me it’s definitely a yes.

      • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        I thought this until I read the longer version of The Stand where he’d put a load of padding back in and updated all the cultural references to the late 80s for no good reason.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    Luckily the extended editions didn’t try to feature all the songs in the books. I want an epic fantasy, not a damned musical.