• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Antinatalism isn’t just a personal decision to not have kids, it’s an ideological belief that having kids is morally wrong.

    • Arkaelus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is an overgeneralisation which completely misses the nuance. Antinatalism does not postulate that it’s morally wrong to procreate, only that it is morally wrong to bring another human consciousness into a soup of suffering, which… yeah, kinda’! I mean, is the world not presently a soup of suffering, with extra helpings on the way?

      Personally, I doubt most people who subscribe to Antinatalism would do so if society weren’t literally a hell hole right now.

        • Arkaelus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The world as it is now, yes. But this is far from the only option, thus the world is not an inevitable soup of suffering. So, no.

          • Katrisia@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Unless you’re both an antinatalist and a philosophical pessimist and believe that the world will always be that soup. But yeah, that’s not the case for all antinatalists. A friend of mine calls himself a “temporary antinatalist”.

            • Arkaelus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              True. I guess the distinction, though semantically redundant, seems to be contextually necessary nowadays…