You are right that the ROK holds DPRK citizens captive (that’s the main thing I meant with “victims of involuntary human trafficking” of “defectors”).
That said, I really don’t think your conjecture is right. I think a bunch of DPRK businesses operate in China, so it’s easy enough to get permission to work there, but there is still border security (see when Laura Ling got owned) and China still captures people fleeing the DPRK and ships them back. It’s not like with the South where they will basically be captured like a Pokemon and enslaved to the propaganda apparatus, a DPRKorean who escapes into China still has a long way to go to get anywhere that won’t ultimately send them back, so it’s not as all-or-nothing as the DMZ.
Edit: To be clear, I’m not saying this to attack the DPRK, I think the DPRK itself would agree to this as roughly the official word.
Yeah that seems about right i wasnt implying they have open border just meant like the China border is quite normal. All countries have border security of some kind. And its normal to deport people who enter your country illegally back to their country of origin too. (Normal as in that’s what most places do, not that its a good thing to do).
Like not counting the DMZ (Which both Korean Governments have as one of their borders.) The main barriers to a DPRK citizen trying to leave the DPRK are mostly a result of the sanctions i think. Like if someone from the DPRK gets permission from their own government to go on a vacation in France for example its not like France is going to let them. So when people say people aren’t allowed to leave as if that’s some dig at the DPRK its weird to me. Like they are sanctioned by most countries on Earth, and their citizens wouldn’t be safe in most other countries anyway.
Like if the rest of the world was actually opening and welcoming to the DPRK and the DPRK was still like “Nobody can leave!” that would be a different story, but that clearly is not the case yknow?
You are right that the ROK holds DPRK citizens captive (that’s the main thing I meant with “victims of involuntary human trafficking” of “defectors”).
That said, I really don’t think your conjecture is right. I think a bunch of DPRK businesses operate in China, so it’s easy enough to get permission to work there, but there is still border security (see when Laura Ling got owned) and China still captures people fleeing the DPRK and ships them back. It’s not like with the South where they will basically be captured like a Pokemon and enslaved to the propaganda apparatus, a DPRKorean who escapes into China still has a long way to go to get anywhere that won’t ultimately send them back, so it’s not as all-or-nothing as the DMZ.
Edit: To be clear, I’m not saying this to attack the DPRK, I think the DPRK itself would agree to this as roughly the official word.
Yeah that seems about right i wasnt implying they have open border just meant like the China border is quite normal. All countries have border security of some kind. And its normal to deport people who enter your country illegally back to their country of origin too. (Normal as in that’s what most places do, not that its a good thing to do).
Like not counting the DMZ (Which both Korean Governments have as one of their borders.) The main barriers to a DPRK citizen trying to leave the DPRK are mostly a result of the sanctions i think. Like if someone from the DPRK gets permission from their own government to go on a vacation in France for example its not like France is going to let them. So when people say people aren’t allowed to leave as if that’s some dig at the DPRK its weird to me. Like they are sanctioned by most countries on Earth, and their citizens wouldn’t be safe in most other countries anyway.
Like if the rest of the world was actually opening and welcoming to the DPRK and the DPRK was still like “Nobody can leave!” that would be a different story, but that clearly is not the case yknow?
That’s fair