Gift link, so it should be accessible to all.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    WHY?! WHY ARE THEY BEING SO STUPID WITH HOGWARTS?!

    They built this whole world into the game and did NOTHING with it! It’s empty! Hogwarts the settings is perfect! The castle was fun to walk around in, to explore! I 100%'d the game because I loved exploring in it! Then they did nothing else to the game. I don’t even remember what the antagonist’s name was!

    The game oversold all expectations! People just loved shelling out money for it! Then WB just dropped it.

    I see things bitching every day about how their game studios don’t make enough money and then they shit the bed here by just letting that game sit here!

    If they’re actually worried about money why are they not cranking out DLC every 4-6 months?! People would buy it! The world they built is begging to have more stories told, and people are holding out their wallets asking for more content for it - and they cancel it?!? They can’t bitch and moan that games don’t make money and then they just flip the off switch on their freaking money printer.

    Thanks. That was cathartic.

    • dota__2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      (please do not support TERF content, pirate it if you really want to nostalgia bait yourself)

      because dlc is not something you just “do”. it’s something of a scale and complexity that needs to be planned out from the go. If the dev team is allowed to cook you might get an Assassin’s creed 2 situation. but this company will almost certainly not allow that to happen.

      (please do not support TERF content, pirate it if you really want to nostalgia bait yourself)

      • JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not OP but I bought it for my sister who is notoriously impossible to buy birthday presents for because she explicitly requested something for once, then I played it through Steam family sharing to deny at least one sale of the game.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m suprised and a lil’ confused why you would share this story in response. Respectfully, it feels like you’re shifting blame. Like, okay, sure, It’s your sister’s birthdays fault you gave money to a terf.

          I mean, you do you but if the trans persecution isn’t a deal breaker when it comes to something so basic as media choices. Then, whatever. Own it.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is someone upset they can’t fork over more money to the rabidly transphobic piece of shit and the media conglomerate megacorp?

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right message. Wrong tone. Assuming you want people to fork less money to the transphobic piece of shit.

        You do want that, right?

        • dota__2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          coddling the oblivious to enable the bigots has not been a winning strategy on any front if you simply look around.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seeing how the game prominently features trans characters and that Rowling wasn’t involved in making it, it probably doesn’t bother many people.

        I want to support media that show and empathize with trans people, and Hogwarts is one of them. But yes, even though she was not involved, she surely is receiving some royalties due to the setting.

        • dota__2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          hogwarts is not the place to do that then. there are plenty of other queer games out there to support queer game dev. instead of pretending that giving money to rowling is doing anything to support trans people.

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It would be ridiculous to pretend so. Giving money to trans-supportive games absolutely does though.

            • dota__2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              you are giving money to rowling with the purchase of any offically licensed harry potter product. that allows her to continue pushing her bullshit.

              there are actual trans-supportive games out there to support and stop trying to make excuses for your inability to get past your nostalgia.

              • dev_null@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Rowling having slightly more money makes no difference to her spewing her views, she is set for life anyway. Yes I’d like to avoid giving her money, but a much stronger signal I’d like to send is that a game with trans characters sells well.

                  • dev_null@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I am aware the motives behind it are profit driven. But that doesn’t make the message less valuable. People seeing themselves represented is helpful to them, and it normalizes them for other people.