As it turns out it doesn’t actually cost that much on regular transit, there’s an AIRPORT SURCHARGE because it’s an “airport train”.

No wonder Americans don’t use public transit, even when the system exists it’s ridiculously difficult and expensive to use.

Source

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Edit the listed fare in the post is nearly 4x the actual fare.

    As it turns out it doesn’t actually cost that much on regular transit, there’s an AIRPORT SURCHARGE because it’s an “airport train”.

    If she’s not going to an airport (the pictured station is in SF and not SFO) this is just strait up wrong. As a regular BART rider who’s used transbay service for years BART can’t tell what trains you ride. They bill purely on the entry and exit station. I’ve pulled some transfers that on other systems would be wildly expensive to work around occasional systemwide issues without increased cost.

    Within SF it costs the fixed Muni rate which is a lot cheaper. It is disturbingly fast and reliable especially as parts of the system date from the Nixon administration. It can be annoying to get to and from though.

    Edit: The furthest fare from Oakland (Coliseum) to the station in the photograph (Montgomery) is 5.20. Using the OAK connector does bring it up to 12.65. Going to SFO from Coliseum is 12.10. Going for some reason airport to airport is 19.55. Not sure where she got $16 from.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Even the listed price is cheaper than cabs or car rentals tho. Cabs charge about 3.50 and then 0.55 for every 5th of a mile. So about $35 for 13 miles.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think the point is that public transport should be cheaper than driving your own car. That’s the only way to encourage adoption.

        Unfortunately our country is being run by the cartoon villain from “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?”

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Well, you also pay for parking in SF.

          And a brand new car is like a 5 to 15 year loan. You have to subtract more than just fuel costs.

      • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        BART, Muni and others are staring down the gun of drastic cuts right now due to COVID gutting their finances. The feds won’t help and the state is preparing to have the budget gutted by the Trump administration and is looking for things to cut that won’t hurt (these generally don’t exist). I find more expensive programs unlikely right now.

        I’m just hoping BART doesn’t collapse at this point

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        If it was free, we probably wouldn’t have it because the system would have broken down with no money to fix it.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Just like the roads!

          When people say “free” with regards to a public service, they usually take it as understood that maintenance costs should be collectively shared via something like taxes. Better understood as “free at point of usage”.

          • Որբունի@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah, roads are insanely expensive, we’d live in a very different world if they weren’t free to use for everyone in most countries and all the money that wouldn’t have ended up in road maintenance (because usage costs of heavy trucks wouldn’t make them cost effective) went to rail and shipping. And let’s not even count the insane networks of high speed roads that most rich countries built after 1945 that cost trillions of dollars globally.

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              the big thing is that most roads are paved and regularly maintained these days, medieval britain for example had an absurd density of roads (higher than today) but most of them were just shitty tracks for carts to rumble along. Like back then an actually paved road was kind of on the same level as railways are now, a massive investment that makes things so much better

          • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Exactly what I was thinking of when I made that comment. Highway maintenance is paid for, at least in part, through tolls.

          • Doubletake2121@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            Road maintenance is funded by the people that use them, in the form of tolls, registrations, and gas taxes. Public transport is mostly taxpayers that don’t use it, subsidized by riders. That’s a massive difference.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              That’s certainly the theory, but in practice most states don’t actually cover the full cost of roads with use fees and need to get taxpayers to fund most of it.
              Public transportation often does better in this regard when you actually look at funding by source.
              Additionally the people who have the highest usage, freight shipping, invariably have disproportionate influence on lawmakers and can argue that the fees they see should be proportionally lower than others.
              Because gas taxes are paid at the pump, we can’t actually adjust them to exclude low income persons either, making them a regressive tax.

              Public transportation is able to charge a few dollars per rider per trip. Given the density they can move, they can generate unexpected revenue per trip at lower costs, again due to density. A subway car is more expensive than a car, but also sees higher utilization and holds about 100 times more people on average.

              Neither is generally able to afford to be built using only use fees.

              In the end, even though I don’t think we should be reliant on cars, the part I’m least upset about is taxpayers funding a public good. Transportation benefits everyone, even if they don’t directly use it. It’s big, it’s expensive, and doing it right has different incentives from making money.

                  • Doubletake2121@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Those numbers absolutely don’t back your point. Most of those states provide greater than 50% of the revenue for their roads from local sources, whereas public transport is less than 50% in most cases. None of them get close to funding themselves.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          They didn’t say ‘‘not funded by any means’’ they said ‘‘free’’ meaning ‘‘free to ride’’ the upside of free to ride is that it’s accessible to everyone all the time. The funding for public services can come from a lot of different revenue, for instance ad space on the transit, concessions, taxes on luxury items, even state lottery systems.