• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Promoting within the company is always faster…

    Why are people comparing this to a new hire? Apples and oranges people.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      And even outside of the company, I bet it would be significantly faster to hire someone if all the candidates were locked in a office room with the interviewers until a candidate was picked.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Interestingly, this is one way people would be chosen for promotion in a worker co-op. The Catholic Church has been syndicalist this whole time.

        Edit: let me clarify that. The Papal Conclave gets all the cardinals together to decide on the next Pope. Usually, they choose someone from the cardinals (though not always). So typically, all the candidates for promotion are right there in the room and part of the decision making process.

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That’s just not accessible for so many people for various reasons like disabilities, parental responsibilities etcz

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          they weren’t making a serious suggestion. they were saying that’s how it works with the pope, of course a hire would go faster if it was done that way.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, that moves the question. How come so many companies refuse to promote within?

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They would need to hire to fill that old position anyways, or double up someone else’s workload.

        And the unfortunate reality, hiring new is cheaper promotion usually implies a pay raise, and if the position you’ve held has already had a few promotions… you usually want to move with some esteem. Not at the very bottom again.

        Training everyone for each step up is costly, while training one single person is trivial.