Which will end the first time they can’t make a payment. It’s like you do not understand basic economics. Without a job you can’t pay for things. It doesn’t matter if you have a credit card or not. Your credit card will be closed because you have no income.
Trust me. They’ll pay.
With what money dude. You’re completely ignoring the cost factor here.
The person that wrote the anti article thinks that 2fa is a form of password… they’re the one that doesn’t understand passkeys.
Password manager can store passkeys as well. They’re way easier to fill than passwords, they always work and never have issues with filling like you can have on some websites that just don’t work well with pw managers.
People literally will not be able to afford it. Neither will companies.
Yeah I was sure it was more like 100%
I’d like to look into jujutsu, but I’m very concerned that I might make the hardest part of software development even harder, especially as it won’t be mature right now. Even if I look at it for myself, I could end up distancing myself from the git pain that everyone else has in the team, and thereby make things worse.
That was exactly what it did in my experience. Until they get their own backend rather than operating with a git backend it’s probably going to continue being like that. It was a very intuitive interface otherwise.
Why block? You can’t report them every time you see them then! I only block spam accounts that don’t get removed after like a month of reporting, it’s impossible to keep an eye on transphobes or nazis if you block them.
I don’t drink milk, I’m just asking if you want to see it in stores.
Of what? From what source? Collected in what way? Just blindly trusting a chart with no data attached to it is exactly how we got into the misinformation age.
you could do that before. there was nothing stopping you, including the law.
the fact that the vibe coded versions barely work at all is a testament to the fact that LLMs do not mean this is any easier now. the hard part isn’t decompiling the software.
This is a very badly written article that conflates TOTP with passwords and then uses that to try to draw a line between totp and passkeys. Passkeys are limited in use in the exact same way that password are. The entity making the website gets to decide the rules.
Attested passkeys will not happen for common big tech websites because they wouldn’t completely prevent the use of password managers.
All these companies are pushing for passkeys because they not only are vastly better for security, but because they remove liability for these companies.
The author falls down the steepest slope I’ve ever seen writing this article, and still fails to see the basic facts.
Yes yes in fact you can.
I mean do you want to see human breast milk in stores?
Yeah… that’s how protests work. They change the narrative and get people that won’t go to protests to go to city council meetings or to email or call their government officials.
Don’t go to New Orleans, floors in even the nicest hotels are sticky. Even the carpet is sticky. It’s disgusting.
There is no “containment” though. Like, these companies purposefully set the bots loose on the internet. They’re not trying to contain anything. They just use that word cause it sounds like they’re doing something. Any sort of containment would defeat the entire purpose of what they’re trying to sell.
You can pay after they scan the first item. It won’t go through until they finish the transaction. So put stuff on conveyor. Wait for them to scan first item. Tap your card. Go pack up your bags while they’re scanning. When they’re done you’re done.
“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”