House Democratic lawmakers reportedly used a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups that have been driving constituent calls and pressuring the party to act like a genuine opposition force in the face of the Trump administration’s authoritarian assault on federal agencies and key programs.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So you want them to do the things they’re already doing to delay votes that will happen in short matter regardless of what they do?

    Reminder that only simple majority of 51 breaks filibuster for cabinet and judge confirmation hearings since 2013 and 2017 respectively. The DNC stalled for 30 hours because they were allowed to by the GOP, and the hearing still went through as planned. Nothing can stop this.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Republican party has used every dirty tactic they can to advance their agenda regardless of their current count of votes in the house or Senate. Remember how they refused to confirm a Supreme Court pick for over a year on the off chance that they’d win the 2016 election? Remember how they stonewalled and blocked anything and everything every way they could during the Obama, Trump and Biden administrations? There is no “they go low we go high” because all that gets is more incrementalism

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Every dirty trick” is having actual majorities without independents to caucus. That is exactly why Republicans were able to deny the Obama appointee.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          “Every dirty trick” is having actual majorities without independents to caucus.

          Don’t blame the independents. They weren’t the fucking turncoats who voted with Republicans.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Sometimes they did. Thats kind of what it means to be Independent, you dont vote with the party. One of them is the reason we don’t have public healthcare and instead only medicaid expansion.

            Still, a supermajority with caucus would be nice and more than 50 dem would be salvation.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              And now you’ve pivoted from 2020-2022, which is the useless neoliberal majority we were talking about, to 2008-2010, which is the useless neoliberal supermajority that kept the filibuster around just to make sure that the public option died.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                After 2011 actually, specifically the most productive and progressive US congress in modern history when Dems had 58 for 72 days in the 111th congress.

                When we came up 1 independent vote short of socialized healthcare.

                2013 was over a decade ago. Even 2014 was over a decade ago.