House Democratic lawmakers reportedly used a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups that have been driving constituent calls and pressuring the party to act like a genuine opposition force in the face of the Trump administration’s authoritarian assault on federal agencies and key programs.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Every dirty trick” is having actual majorities without independents to caucus.

    Don’t blame the independents. They weren’t the fucking turncoats who voted with Republicans.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Sometimes they did. Thats kind of what it means to be Independent, you dont vote with the party. One of them is the reason we don’t have public healthcare and instead only medicaid expansion.

      Still, a supermajority with caucus would be nice and more than 50 dem would be salvation.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        And now you’ve pivoted from 2020-2022, which is the useless neoliberal majority we were talking about, to 2008-2010, which is the useless neoliberal supermajority that kept the filibuster around just to make sure that the public option died.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          After 2011 actually, specifically the most productive and progressive US congress in modern history when Dems had 58 for 72 days in the 111th congress.

          When we came up 1 independent vote short of socialized healthcare.

          2013 was over a decade ago. Even 2014 was over a decade ago.