Jo Miran@lemmy.ml to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · edit-25 个月前Equal under the law or somethinglemmy.mlimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1803arrow-down169file-text
arrow-up1734arrow-down1imageEqual under the law or somethinglemmy.mlJo Miran@lemmy.ml to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · edit-25 个月前message-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·5 个月前The screenshot includes a date and time. It was accurate at the time.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 个月前Did the guy happen to be brown or something?
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 个月前He had a brown name. But apparently he had an isis flag too.
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 个月前 …apparently he had an isis flag too. Unconfirmed. It was a black flag hitch cover last I read, and I don’t know of many places selling ISIS pick-up truck accessories.
minus-squarefrostysauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·5 个月前And it no longer is, so you should delete it.
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·5 个月前Did the FBI say initially say it was not terrorism? Yes. Regardless of whether or not they changed their mind later, their initial reaction is and will always be fact. That was the point of the post.
minus-squareLovable Sidekick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down13·5 个月前Taking shit down when you find out it’s wrong is a thing.
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down2·5 个月前It’s a note for historians. And how they backtracked based on public pressure. OP should keep the post up. Tankie alert
minus-squareLovable Sidekick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·5 个月前Willful ignorance can in fact be a tool for historians, so at least that part of the rationalization is true,
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·5 个月前It isn’t wrong. They said it wasn’t terrorism at first. That is and will remain a fact and it is the point of the post.
minus-squareFanBlade@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 个月前And when did they say Luigi’s actions were terrorism?
The screenshot includes a date and time. It was accurate at the time.
Did the guy happen to be brown or something?
He had a brown name. But apparently he had an isis flag too.
Unconfirmed. It was a black flag hitch cover last I read, and I don’t know of many places selling ISIS pick-up truck accessories.
And it no longer is, so you should delete it.
Did the FBI say initially say it was not terrorism? Yes. Regardless of whether or not they changed their mind later, their initial reaction is and will always be fact. That was the point of the post.
Taking shit down when you find out it’s wrong is a thing.
It’s a note for historians. And how they backtracked based on public pressure.
OP should keep the post up.
Tankie alert
Willful ignorance can in fact be a tool for historians, so at least that part of the rationalization is true,
It isn’t wrong. They said it wasn’t terrorism at first. That is and will remain a fact and it is the point of the post.
deleted by creator
And when did they say Luigi’s actions were terrorism?