Can’t escape AI slop projects from meat proxies man. Every single open source project smells like Claude Code recently. Sad times.

  • razen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It is less of a marketing for Rust rather giving it a new name: Slop Language.

    Not because it is slop, it is great but the way people are using it is not very great

  • Haley@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’d hate Rust, but Lunduke hates Rust because trans people write in Rust, so I like Rust just to piss off Lunduke’s homophobic ass

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    17 hours ago

    A month!? A lot of these fuckers pop up just over the weekend, and then are never heard from again.

    Vibe coded garbage.

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Rust really has a reputation. Not only it is associated with slop and snobbery (slobbery?), but also with efforts to steal skill and capability from the community by “rewrite it in Rust”-ing FOSS projects into projects with corporate-friendly licenses that enable wholesale project theft and enshittification.

    • KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Can you explain this? Rust is a programming language, so what do “corporate-friendly licenses” have to do with what programming language somebody is using?

      • Hugh@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is probably a reference to (canonical?) Rewriting gnu coreutils in rust and changing the license from GPL to MIT

  • zen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This is one of the cases where the actual thing is amazing but the fandom for it is insufferable.

    There is nothing wrong with Rust. It’s incredible. I’ve been writing code with it for years.

  • TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Seeing slopsayers and rust aficionados fight in the comments is like coming across a baron and revenant going at it in melee.

    Hell yeah.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    1 day ago

    It does make me sad that Rust is getting so strongly associated with slop. Personally I find it a really fun language to actually program in. The language being expression-based is actually quite handy, and is a concept I wish existed in other languages too. But it is also unfortunately the most sensible language for vibe-coding too because of the performance and guardrails.

    • anbu141
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Wouldn’t it be great to master a language like C while also grasping the logic behind other programming languages? I’m not entirely against artificial intelligence, but it’s completely useless—it’s absolute garbage.

      • furtiveParalysis@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I for one grasp C and work with it, no big deal. AI does it well too and is probably going to eat the fun-of-coding out of my job. That’s sad to me but, it’s not useless. For now there’s a lot of stuff we didn’t maintain like docs and unit tests and thanks to ai it’s kept up to date now, not that it’s very important but we strive at just doing more, not being less workers.

        • anbu141
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yes, you are absolutely right. Regardless of how proficient an LLM (large language model) might be at documentation and coding, it remains just that—an LLM. If you write the documentation yourself, you can craft it in a way that is both engaging and humorous. I am not suggesting that we should avoid using LLMs altogether; I simply believe they should be used with moderation.

    • motruck@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah well you can thank rust tools that are replacing coreutils and somehow finding their way as defaults. Eza is a prime example. Oh pretty icons but you can’t handle ls -larth, so glad you are in rust though. Rust has had a reputation before the slop.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Eza isn’t a reimplementation… it’s its own program. The name of the binary is also eza not ls. What OS are you using that uses eza instead of ls? I have both installed and have ls aliased to eza because I find the coloured output to be easier to read (much like syntax-highlighted code is easier to read), but I’ve never seen eza pre-installed on a system, not does it conflict with ls. Package managers let you install both. They’re different programs.

        • wylinka@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          CachyOS aliases ls to eza in fish, which is the default shell there. I love fish but still think it’s a bit weird to use it as default.

        • anewfox@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          19 hours ago

          you’re not gonna get a reply to these questions, because they installed eza themself and also, separately, heard about ubuntu adopting the uutils reimplementations of coreutils, which of course does not include eza.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Slop code? Missing features? Add in some arrogant wunderkinder and strong vendor push and you’ve got Systemd.

      • Anas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Surprisingly not a red flag, it can be used to sabotage potential sloppers.

      • Spite_By_Design_LLC@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        … is an indication of tooling, not a scarlet letter that AI contributed to the source code. A dev can include AGENTS.md to support automated maintenance (pre-commit hooks, config scripts, Github actions) without making AI part of the software. Does Makefile mean GNU Make wrote your program?

        “AI. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means”