• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Our long-term goal should be to continue to build up grassroots movements for the working class; this won’t happen in a day.

    Cool, now which is easier to build movements under, a fascist regime, or a moderate milquetoast capitalist regime?

    Will throwing your vote away in protest of ‘the duopoly’ do anything, in this election, to change that or meaningfully contribute to a grassroots movement for the working class?

    We have a thousand tools at our disposal. Voting is one - an important one. Tools should not be misused, but each one used in its own unique way to maximize its effect on your goals.

    • ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Cool, now which is easier to build movements under, a fascist regime, or a moderate milquetoast capitalist regime?

      Let’s be real here, the kind of person ranting on the internet about “ThE DuOpOlY” is not actually interested in building anything at all. They just like to stomp their feet, and shout “no fair!” over and over again like the petculant children they are, while the grownups are busy trying to prevent the country from descending into fascism.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not the same person, but I carry similar sentiments. I helped form the second largest tech union in North America. What are you doing to support the working working class and build alternatives to capital? Tossing support at the nearest person in fear doesn’t prevent fascism.

        • ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Voting against the fascist candidate abso-fucking-lutely prevents fascism. This is an extremely simple concept that one would imagine the founder of the second-largest tech union in North America should be able to wrap their mind around.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think my point has been missed. The fact that there’s an openly fascist candidate running for president means that fascism is already here and in power.

            • Omega@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              They’re not in power. But you’re helping them get back in power. If people like you decided to get behind the non-fascist, it would be a non-issue, hence the post.

              • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                I can name some of them. You probably recognize them.

                • Mike Johnson
                • Marjorie Greene
                • Mitch McConnell
                • Jacob Frey
                • Leonard Leo

                Nowhere did I say I wasn’t voting. Voting is the least effective method of change that exists, but it’s still a method. I will still be participating because it can lead to minor changes. If you think that defeating fascism can be done by voting once every 4 years however, you will be played.

                • Omega@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’m glad that you participate. Voting is the easiest and most direct method of change.

                  And yeah, it can be defeated by voting (every 2 years, for primaries too) if you have enough people to join. It’s unfortunate that there are enough cynics who don’t participate who could make real change if they did.

                  Every time Trump’s judges make another radical ruling, I’m reminded that people stayed home. And now pregnant women aren’t safe in red states, just as one example.

                  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    it can be defeated by voting

                    It never has been. Even in France with the left coalition, Macron has been courting the fascist right.

        • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          To use your example, here are the options:

          • today we can definitely get a Union that covers some tech workers but not all of them.

          Or

          • today we can try to get a Union for all tech workers, but it’s a long shot. And if we lose, the consequences are that we don’t get another union vote for 4 years and during that time, the tech companies get to run rampant with negative propaganda about unions, making the challenge even harder next time.

          Which would you choose, second largest tech union guy?

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            False dichotomy. The stakes of the second version are the same for the first regardless of union size. There never has been and never will be a guaranteed union campaign until we overthrow capitalism.

    • leftofjillstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      2 months ago

      We are currently in a fascist regime; both parties are heavily lobbied by corporations that dictate policy.

      People continue to struggle more and more under both parties, while they play political theater to continue to divide us.

      Voting outside the two-party system will help establish that people do have standards when voting.

      Voting is one - an important one.

      Yes, and a good percentage of the populace decides to stay in and not reward the duopoly with their vote.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem with this take is that you cannot conversely punish the duopoly by withholding your vote, regardless of whether or not you think they “earned” it. Even if you don’t vote, one of them still gets in. The problem is, the people who are going to vote for the significantly worse of the two options are very motivated to vote, and they will do so.

        • Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah. Somehow they think that if they don’t vote- no one gets elected. They don’t understand that a decision will be made without their input.

          Or they do, and that’s the entire point.

        • leftofjillstein@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          37
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Lord won’t help us on this one; we need to be the ones to fight for what we demand.

          The civil rights movements happened because people were fed up with the status quo.

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 months ago

            The presidential election year before the Voting Rights Act of 1965 saw relatively high voter turnout. 61.4%

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States_presidential_elections

            People voted in the Democratic Party candidate by a wide margin. 61.1%

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1964_United_States_presidential_election

            If we protest, but then don’t vote, nothing will change. So voting in records numbers is the answer. Specifically, in our present case, voting for the party that wants to improve things incrementally over fascists.

                • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  And the Democrats are perpetrating a genocide, sending cops and SWAT after students and people protesting that genocide, not letting them talk at the DNC, and trying to suppress their freedom of speech and assembly. That’s also very fascist.

                  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The Democrats are neoliberals. As neoliberals, they are both center-right and institutionalists, so they do stuff like police crack downs on protesters. This is not fascism on its own. Denying a speaking slot to the Uncommitted Movement was a strategic failure, but it is not fascism.

                    Biden is a Zionist, so on top of sticking to 70 years of US foreign policy of allying with Israel he has been actively complicit in genocide. Zionism is a form of fascism that attempts to manipulate Jews and Christians alike to build a Jewish ethnostate. Not everyone who is a self-described Zionist is inherently bought into the actual ideology. There are plenty of people who want a place for Jewish people to be safe. Zionism is not that, but there have been plenty of people who have been fooled into thinking it is. Biden is not a fascist, but he has given the fascists in Israel nearly everything they wanted. Thankfully Biden has so far refused Israel’s request to attack Iran.

                    Also, thankfully Kamala is running for president, not Biden. Kamala is not a lifelong Zionist. Kamala has said she is willing to defend Israel, but being willing to defend a long standing ally is not the same as letting them do whatever they want. Under Kamala, the Democrats are going to do everything in their power to get a ceasefire deal to end the war and the genocide.

                    Trump is on record as saying Israel needs to finish what they started. Trump is going to let Israel complete its genocide of the Palestinians. He’s going to allow the war to continue indefinitely so Benjamin Netanyahu can stay out of prison, deny Palestinian statehood, and form a greater Israel by conquering as much of the Middle East as possible.

                    https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/04/politics/trump-israel-comments/index.html

                    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-israel-gaza-finish-problem-rcna141905

                    The Republican Party has been taken over by the fascist MAGA movement, not the Democratic Party. Trump is the fascist, not Kamala. And Trump being elected would be worse for the Palestinians and the Middle East as a whole. So we should strategically vote for Kamala.

              • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Please provide examples to justify your claim. I’d like to know more. I’ll give you your first one since it’s everywhere in the headlines nowadays - weapons to Israel.

          • ChewbaccasClitoris@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            There is the right to cast a vote, also a right to protest.

            Please don’t confuse the two and protest by not voting.

            • leftofjillstein@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              26
              ·
              2 months ago

              Voting and protesting: to create a better society, people need to be willing to demand more than what the status quo can provide.

              • Soup@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Heads up. “Left of Shill Stein” is what most know to be called democrats.

          • breakingcups@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 months ago

            How is giving your vote to whoever becomes the largest by not voting winning anything? You can do all the other things you mentioned and still make a conscious choice to do the least harm by not voting a demagogue in. It’s just one of the many steps you can take as a person wishing to influence the world around you.

            Just like eating no meat or less meat. Will it fix everything wrong with farming? No. Does that mean you should just start buying more meat and not eat it, letting it rot in your fridge instead? Also no! No one cares if you did that and it accomplishes nothing except make the problem much worse, which is exactly what not voting gets you.

              • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Then get involved in a 3rd party that works against the republican fascists and coordinates with Democrats for ballot access like WFP.

                Whining about “the duopoly” and not voting will just move things further right.

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Reading comments like this is unbelievably frustrating, because you’re so close to being right, but you refuse to take that next tiny step, which makes you dangerously wrong.

        Yes, both parties are lobbied out the ass, it’s bad and it’s wrong, but which party at least tries to mitigate the harm? Yes, there’s unproductive political theater that divides, but which party at least tries to talk about real issues that matter to everyday voters?

        Your approach is akin to burning down the house instead of doing the hard work of fixing the roof. You will never get the outcome you imagine by voting for a third party, unless you do the hard work of improving our overall system, from inside the system. You play the game with the team you have, not the team you want.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        We are currently in a fascist regime; both parties are heavily lobbied by corporations that dictate policy.

        That’s not fascism.

        People continue to struggle more and more under both parties, while they play political theater to continue to divide us.

        100% people need to engage more. And in national elections quit voting for 3rd parties. Showing solidarity with and not dividing themselves from the rest of the left. Till our voting system is reformed and 3rd party presidential candidates are no longer a mathematical impossibility. With the only message being sent, that you’re safe to ignore.

        Voting outside the two-party system will help establish that people do have standards when voting.

        That’s literally the exact opposite of what it does.

        Yes, and a good percentage of the populace decides to stay in and not reward the duopoly with their vote.

        Then they get the lack of change they’ve committed to.

        • Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why is it that any time these pseudo-intellectual “leftists” pop up to spew their bullshit, they’re knocked back by like… 5-10 people that absolutely school them and in the end, all they can respond is-

          “Nuh-uhh!”

          And then rinse and repeat the following day. What do they think they’re accomplishing? I mean, it’s especially very telling that they’re downvoted into the dark ages on a platform that supposedly leans heavily in their direction.

          This says a lot in my opinion. In that there may be hope for lemmy once the election is over and these vapid people eventually collapse in on themselves like a dying star.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            THEY ALWAYS COME BACK. But it will be quieter for a year or two. If they’re sincere, and some are. They’re suffering form the same mental weakness/illness that the MAGATS are. They want to believe they are righteous, correct, and in possession of special knowledge or insight. That they believe those that disagree with them can’t comprehend.

            If they’re not sincere. Well they’re still like the MAGATS. Malicious, spiteful, and crab mentally. Either hypocritically, simply anti-west like most ML you see. Or benefiting disproportionately on the backs of labor. And know the best way to keep labor down. Is to divide it against itself. Kind of like ML governments do as well.