• ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Cool, now which is easier to build movements under, a fascist regime, or a moderate milquetoast capitalist regime?

    Let’s be real here, the kind of person ranting on the internet about “ThE DuOpOlY” is not actually interested in building anything at all. They just like to stomp their feet, and shout “no fair!” over and over again like the petculant children they are, while the grownups are busy trying to prevent the country from descending into fascism.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not the same person, but I carry similar sentiments. I helped form the second largest tech union in North America. What are you doing to support the working working class and build alternatives to capital? Tossing support at the nearest person in fear doesn’t prevent fascism.

      • ZeroCool@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Voting against the fascist candidate abso-fucking-lutely prevents fascism. This is an extremely simple concept that one would imagine the founder of the second-largest tech union in North America should be able to wrap their mind around.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think my point has been missed. The fact that there’s an openly fascist candidate running for president means that fascism is already here and in power.

          • Omega@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’re not in power. But you’re helping them get back in power. If people like you decided to get behind the non-fascist, it would be a non-issue, hence the post.

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              I can name some of them. You probably recognize them.

              • Mike Johnson
              • Marjorie Greene
              • Mitch McConnell
              • Jacob Frey
              • Leonard Leo

              Nowhere did I say I wasn’t voting. Voting is the least effective method of change that exists, but it’s still a method. I will still be participating because it can lead to minor changes. If you think that defeating fascism can be done by voting once every 4 years however, you will be played.

              • Omega@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m glad that you participate. Voting is the easiest and most direct method of change.

                And yeah, it can be defeated by voting (every 2 years, for primaries too) if you have enough people to join. It’s unfortunate that there are enough cynics who don’t participate who could make real change if they did.

                Every time Trump’s judges make another radical ruling, I’m reminded that people stayed home. And now pregnant women aren’t safe in red states, just as one example.

                • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  it can be defeated by voting

                  It never has been. Even in France with the left coalition, Macron has been courting the fascist right.

      • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        To use your example, here are the options:

        • today we can definitely get a Union that covers some tech workers but not all of them.

        Or

        • today we can try to get a Union for all tech workers, but it’s a long shot. And if we lose, the consequences are that we don’t get another union vote for 4 years and during that time, the tech companies get to run rampant with negative propaganda about unions, making the challenge even harder next time.

        Which would you choose, second largest tech union guy?

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          False dichotomy. The stakes of the second version are the same for the first regardless of union size. There never has been and never will be a guaranteed union campaign until we overthrow capitalism.