RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agoIndeedhexbear.netimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up1113arrow-down10
arrow-up1113arrow-down1imageIndeedhexbear.netRNAi [he/him]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square12linkfedilink
minus-squareImnecomrade [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 months agoI think it would be cool to build cities underground and allow much of Earth above ground to be dedicated to natural habitats and parks.
minus-squarerobot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agothere’s some earthship kinda weirdos building hobbit homes and some of those are neat.
minus-squareLe_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agowhat’s the city version of that? i can’t imagine 13 story hills being very viable for a semi-underground apartment block. maybe in Duluth?
minus-squareJohnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agooops my reply was supposed to be to you not to the OP
minus-squarejack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoI think the resource intensity of living underground would have a much worse environmental impact than just living sustainably on the surface
I think it would be cool to build cities underground and allow much of Earth above ground to be dedicated to natural habitats and parks.
there’s some earthship kinda weirdos building hobbit homes and some of those are neat.
what’s the city version of that? i can’t imagine 13 story hills being very viable for a semi-underground apartment block. maybe in Duluth?
oops my reply was supposed to be to you not to the OP
I think the resource intensity of living underground would have a much worse environmental impact than just living sustainably on the surface