• HumbleBragger@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m not a windows user but for what I read this seems to focus on enterprise users. Microsoft could end illegal copies of their OS for every user if they wanted but they need everyone using windows so its the only thing people know in order to make corporations pay for the license and get their employees to work with something they already know.

    • Final Remix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 day ago

      Always was.

      People just kept parroting the bullshit “it’s not DRM, bro. You’ll need for things like to use banking websites” propaganda so much, that it got drowned out. Cheers to microslop’s astroturfibg efforts for that.

      • Dragomus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        I remember the banking excuse … and now that I think about it I don’t know of any financial or public-government sites that used/demanded the TPM chip for windows.

        • SteveTech@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          There’s a few websites now that support WebAuthn which Windows Hello (requiring a TPM) should support.

          For example, the Australian passports.gov.au defaults to “passkeys” and makes it clear they’re “recommend”, my.gov.au also supports passkeys but prefers their mobile app. I just use a Yubikey (+ Linux) though, and it’s always optional anyway. Though I also don’t know of any banks using WebAuthn.

      • cadekat@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        The TPM is legitimately useful outside of DRM, but it’s absolutely mostly for DRM.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m guessing this doesn’t affect the loophole where you can just change your activation servers to something non-Microsoft, then activate Windows from there? As far as I know, this is still a valid method to get a 100% legit copy without paying a single penny. You don’t need to do any KMS fuckery at all via this method. As far as Microsoft is concerned, you paid up.

  • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Massgrave recently introduced the new TSforge Activation method, which can allegedly bypass Microsoft’s entire DRM architecture for software product activation.

    So it seems like it won’t be stopping much, at least for now.

  • 0ndead@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You know, you can just turn off the TPM chip in bios

    Ok, I got around to reading the article. KMS activation now checks the TPM of the KVM server to make sure it’s verified. KMS emulation has always been janky af imo.

    TLDR; Use Massgrave’s TSForge