Same for me. Hopefully someone else did a backup earlier

I’m dying at the irony of claiming 50% of all Nature articles are wrong while also providing literally no evidence

Gosh, it’s like every time some big genuine shitshow is about to be revealed, we get to enjoy some surface-level bullshit distraction. What are the odds?

Nah, those are rookie numbers. Gotta pump those numbers up. And they have a whole playbook ready for it this time, so things are gonna get interesting and tragic sooner than later.

Bonus points that if we make through, we can look forward to new exciting wars about water resources and inhospitable climate problems

Cool story, bro.

PLEASE GO VOTE IF YOU HAVEN’T ALREADY

The sun hurts when you stare at it.

Look, I can do it too!

The two signs you need are:

1. Did you drop off your ballot?
2. Did your local government confirm they received your ballot?

This is the way

Number three seems like the equivalent of assless chaps. I vote two

I don’t know if they’re all bastards, but HR is absolutely not your friend. Human Resources <> protections for employees. Instead, Human Resources = protection for the company

times like these, I feel pretty shitty about how the world and I have condemned my kids to suffer the water wars in a handful of years

Naw, no hate. iPods are fuckin rad. Younger generations should definitely get to enjoy older tech. But the author’s observations weren’t really anything I needed to invest my time in reading. I know old iTunes had a visualizer. I don’t know why I read the whole thing anyways

Why did I just read an article about using an iPod that was clearly written by someone born in the early-mid 2000s? I know the original ipod was fun. I was there, gandalf

This from ye olde tumblr

Replace those first two panels with sneaky napping and this is perfect