The experience of using a degoogled phone, both from the AOSP and Linux side of things.

I had to update to description since people kept thinking that I made the video.

    • vatlark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just watched it, and it mentions ubuntu touch and /e/os.

      Edit: oh you are saying people shouldn’t mention those?

    • Tore@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why not mention Ubuntu or e/Os? I’ve used both on my Fairphone 3+.

      Used Ubuntu Touch for years and I’ve got e/OS installed right now.

      • Hxrmit@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Both are backed by corporations. E/OS also relies on hidden google services, it is also a more bloated lineageOS having worse security than EOL grapheneOS.

        • maam@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Ubuntu Touch is ran by the UBports Foundation after Canonical gave up on it.

        • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          in the case of Ubuntu Touch this simply is not true. Canonical stopped maintaining the code for it in 2017, and since then it has been overseen by the non-profit foundation UBports, which has a few core developers that depend on contributions from a volunteer community as well. Yes, it uses an Ubuntu base and some of the Ubuntu repositories (as do many other Linux distros), and it has an agreement with Canonical to be able to use the name and logos for Ubuntu for no charge, but is otherwise completely independent of Canonical. https://ubports.com/ (posting this from a Poco X3 NFC running Ubuntu Touch 24.04.2)

          • Hxrmit@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Canonical, a UK-based software company mantains it though, the snap packages are also proprietary

            • Vittelius@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              “They” maintain it in the same way that they “maintain” Linux Mint. Which is to say technically they operate the repository that the OS is built from. But that’s misleading as the main OS is built by the German foundation as an immutable OS. That means that the OS packages are tested by the foundation and you can’t install everything else from the repo. Additional software comes in the form of click packages, which as you might have noticed, isn’t snap. Snap support is very much in development at the moment, but only as an additional package manager. Snaps are also mostly open source. The client, the thing that runs on your hardware is free software. It’s the server that’s proprietary.

            • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Ubuntu Touch uses deb and its own fully open source package format called click - none of the system or system apps is installed as snap. It has support for installing snap packages though, although there are still some bugs in using these.