• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    10 天前

    $75–100 million in capital investment and 25–45 jobs

    Only $2M/job! What a steal.

    Dozens of data center projects were already benefiting as of January 2026

    Should be noted that a lot of these data centers can’t turn on, because the grid doesn’t have the capacity. Others can’t turn on because they have no customers lined up, merely trying to front-run demand.

    These tax breaks are subsidizing a business need that hasn’t even materialized yet. And because of the poor regulatory and tax auditing of these highly technical facilities, it is entirely unclear how the state could have recouped these tax losses had the centers ever turned on.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 天前

      Only $2M/job. What a deal

      I love doing this sort of math on things. They could have just paid all those people $200,000 a year for a decade to sit on their ass and it would have cost the same.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 天前

        We were gonna pay Iran $300b so that they wouldn’t charge $8b/month ($2m per ship) in fees for two months.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 天前

        Well no, they couldn’t have, because this is money they can’t get in any case. Data centers that aren’t built don’t pay taxes.

          • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 天前

            Tax exemptions for activity that would not have taken place without those tax exemptions cost the state nothing - no money is being “thrown” and no potential tax income is being forgone. Meanwhile, giving “poor guys” $200,000 a year costs $200,000 per year per poor guy. That’s the difference.