Article text:
Darializa Avila Chevalier, the Democratic congressional nominee endorsed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who ousted longtime Rep. Adriano Espaillat in Tuesday’s primary, maintained a since-deleted Twitter account with repeated sympathetic references to communism, Marxist ideology and Soviet figures, including Vladimir Lenin.
Avila Chevalier, a sociology PhD student whose victory sent shockwaves throughout the Democratic establishment, has been under fire for a since-deleted Twitter account, previously reported by CNN, that included phrases such as “seize the means of production,” along with calls to abolish police, prisons and borders. Other controversial tweets include one that said Black and Arab men are both “Fetishizing ugly colonizer women” and another that described wiping her dirty hands on the American flag in lieu of a napkin.
As an undergraduate, Avila Chevalier attended Columbia University, where she organized with Students for Justice in Palestine, and after graduation became involved in pro-Palestinian campus protests over Israel’s war in Gaza. She also attended a controversial October 8, 2023, pro-Palestinian rally in Times Square — one day after Hamas’ attack on Israel — that featured speeches and rhetoric praising the attack.
She previously told CNN, “I have grown considerably in the years since these tweets, and I am focused on our community and our community’s future.”
On Thursday, President Donald Trump accused Avila Chevalier of being a communist, a charge that she said she wouldn’t respond to while on MSNOW, saying, “I won’t be reactive.”
A further review of Avila Chevalier’s archived Twitter account from 2020-2022 found repeated references to communism and Marxist ideology. The account, “Darializabonet,” appears to have been deleted in June 2022.
The account’s bio read in 2020, “how communist of you.” Archived posts and retweets during this timeframe included a recommendation that Karl Marx’s Capital was an “essential must-read,” a complaint that public libraries did not carry enough Marxist literature by Lenin and other revolutionary writers, and a retweet from a Communist-identifying account lamenting that bookstore “banned books” displays did not include The Complete Works of J. V. Stalin.
One archived retweet from 2020 quoted Assata Shakur, the former Black Liberation Army member who, in 1977, was convicted in the murder of a New Jersey state trooper before later escaping prison and fleeing to Cuba. In the quote, Shakur said she “preferred Ho Chi Minh, Kim Il Sung, Che, or Fidel (Castro)” before studying Marx and Lenin because the two “white dudes” had made contributions to “revolutionary struggle” that were “too great to be ignored.”
In April 2020, Avila Chevalier shared a post lamenting that people wouldn’t accept communism over a lack of varieties of soup – a reference to the critique that the political system leads to fewer consumer choices.
“I just cannot get over the fact that the universe has foisted upon us the perfect illustration of literally every failing of capitalism and people are still like we can’t be communists cuz there won’t be enough types of soup,” the post she retweeted read.
Other posts critiqued or joked about popular culture she viewed as anti-communist.
In one post, Avila Chevalier described the animated film Anastasia as “an explicitly anti-USSR kid’s movie,” and in another post she linked to she wrote: “Time for me to once again sympathize with the people the Bolsheviks put in the blender for like 90 min 😌.”
Avila Chevalier was responding to a viral false claim that Disney had removed Anastasia from Disney+ streaming service because it was anti-Russia after the invasion of Ukraine.
In another post, Avila Chevalier joked that Sheryl Crow’s hit song Soak Up the Sun was “bootstrap capitalist propaganda” after noticing it opens with the lyric “my friend the communist,” quipping that the character was “apparently also a bad organizer lol.”
Another 2020 retweet argued for democratic worker control of wealth, dismissing ideological labels by concluding: “You can call that communism, you can call it socialism, you can call it pancakes.”
And previously, CNN had surfaced an April 2020 post where Avila-Chevalier said that while most of the political theory she had read was communist, “the pyromania associated with anarchism is very intriguing to me,” punctuating the remark with a laughing emoji.
Ok I’ll say it: these posts are hilarious. Our first lefty shitposter congressperson


Sorry, but unless those Tweets are undeleted I’m going to assume AOCification.
Crypto-communism was made up by red scare propaganda, in reality we can’t keep our mouths shut. The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims etc etc. If she really still believes these things, she won’t try to pretend she doesn’t.
I don’t think she even deleted individual tweets, she deleted her whole account after Elon bought twitter bc she wanted to get off the nazi platform
If deleting the posts is the difference between a genuine Marxist-Leninist getting elected into a position of power vs not, then deleting posts is good.
Big online-is-not-real-life moment here. Keeping a shitposting Twitter account is not doing more praxis than like… having a meaningful say in whether your state is able to more effectively facilitate a genocide
I’m just going to mass tag everyone here @SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml @Athena5898@hexbear.net @pleiades@lemmy.ml
She’s already in power. Now that these posts have been unearthed, there’s no benefit in trying to do crypto-communsim (if there ever was). She can either own those posts or denounce/distance/deny, and if she doesn’t own them then she’s an AOC lib.
Let’s see what she does.
She’s literally not though. She won a primary and is essentially garunteed to win, being in a safe blue district, but she’s not in power yet.
Yeah, I mean, no shit. I don’t think any of the people you tagged disagree with this. We are (or I least I am) saying that your litmus test is decidedly posting-brained
It’s kind of an n=1 study I guess, can’t really conclude anything with any litmus test.
/j “All political power comes from statements on the internet” -Mao
Political power grows from Based Tankie Posting -Mao ZeDank
1,000%
She’s already stated she’s not going to comment on the posts at all, which I’d say is an anti-denouncement in its own way
Yeah, good enough for me. I’m not as posting brained as everyone seems to think, I just want people to stand by the things they say.
Oh for sure.
I see your point, but making undeleting her tweets as a sign of her true radicalism is a real “Tell me you think posting is praxis without telling me that you think posting is praxis” kind of cringe.
The reality of the situation is that she’s running for elected office, and that requires cleaning up your image, especially in the internet age. And quite frankly, Any ML running for office should be using it as an opportunity to teach the masses. The masses shouldn’t be learning about Marxism from a Fox News host frothing at the mouth over your dank Lenin meme.
Who is teaching MLism by running for office? Is this person doing that?
There have been big tent communists doing that to an extent in lower offices. Not necessarily MLs only but folks that put focus square on capitalists and a rejection of bourgeois parties.
Rejection of bourgeois politics without a full explication of another system is what causes our long term failure. It’s the exact weakness of non-MLs that forced me to study MLism.
Im still happy with whatever this person is doing because it presents opportunities for marxists to clarify their positions relative to the concrete failures of such endeavors to get the goods. Also whatever this person achieves will likely be material benefits that are nice short term. But im allergic to confusing this with any long term goals
Based on their posting history there’s a decent chance they’ll at least start out with good agitation. Hard to predict more than that since it’s just one person.
Didn’t Rosa Luxemburg have a quote about socialists being forced to deradicalize when participating in bourgeois governments or something like that? (Sorry I can’t seem to find it) I saw it used with regards to Mamdani, I have a feeling the same thing might happen again
She said it a few times but here’s an old banger from this work:
The same thing will always happen when your party is a nazi capitalist western supremacist one like it is with the dems or with the reps
Not so much the twitter thing but I do feel the “don’t shut up thing”. It takes so much energy to measure what I’m saying and make it okay for most people…and I still fail a lot.