Full text
Brad Lander, an ally of Mayor Zohran Mamdani, won the Democratic primary in a progressive New York House district on Tuesday, according to The Associated Press, in a race that hinged largely on the candidates’ different stances on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
With 53 percent of the vote counted, Mr. Lander, a former city comptroller and mayoral candidate who has criticized Israel’s war in Gaza, was almost 30 points ahead of the incumbent, Representative Dan Goldman, a pro-Israel former federal prosecutor who helped lead the first impeachment inquiry into President Trump.
Mr. Lander benefited from his deep roots in the 10th District, which covers Lower Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn. His victory makes him the likely winner of the general election in November.
Mr. Lander, 56, was one of three progressive primary candidates endorsed by Mr. Mamdani, with whom he has had a political alliance since last year’s Democratic mayoral primary.
The two men began as rivals, but cross-endorsed each other as the primary date closed in, saying they wanted to work together to keep former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo from winning the nomination. Their alliance has elevated them both — Mr. Mamdani to City Hall, and Mr. Lander to the cusp of a congressional victory.
Mr. Lander reflected on the decision to team up with Mr. Mamdani during a televised debate last week, saying it had modeled a new kind of politics for New York.
“It unleashed a nice sense of solidarity,” he said on the debate stage. “People said to me, ‘Wait, you mean politics doesn’t have to be a sour, selfish ego trip — it can be a team sport for the values you share?’”
Among several closely watched primaries across the city and state, the contest in the 10th District was notable for the degree to which it was dominated by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both Mr. Lander and Mr. Goldman are Jewish and describe themselves as liberal Zionists, but they approach the issue in very different ways.
Mr. Lander has spent decades in the world of progressive Jewish activism, working with organizations like Jews for Racial and Economic Justice and cofounding the New York Jewish Agenda, a left-leaning group.
He has also been a longtime player in Democratic politics in New York City, and entered the primary with a committed base and a groundswell of good will in the district.
He spent many years running a community development organization in Park Slope, then served on the City Council for more than a decade representing several of the congressional district’s neighborhoods. After he left the Council, he served as city comptroller, during which time he chose not to repurchase State of Israel bonds that had matured.
Mr. Lander has been an outspoken critic of Israel since the start of the war in Gaza, which began after the Hamas-led terror attack on Oct. 7, 2023.
Mr. Lander has backed claims by human rights groups and a United Nations commission that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, frequently using that word on the campaign trail, and has said he supports legislation to block U.S. military aid to the country until it meets human rights standards.
Mr. Goldman’s views hew more closely to the longtime status quo in American politics regarding the U.S.-Israel relationship. He is a critic of Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, but has said he supports continuing to provide the military aid that underpins the decades-long alliance between the two countries.
And he has said he does not believe Israel has committed genocide in Gaza or that its treatment of the Palestinians can fairly be described as apartheid — another word Mr. Lander frequently uses — calling them ideologically charged terms.
Mr. Goldman accepted the endorsement of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a hard-line pro-Israel lobbying group increasingly shunned by Democrats, but was also endorsed by J Street, a more liberal pro-Israel group.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/23/nyregion/ny10-primary-lander.html


Israel was clearly not a top issue however. This is a “blame Netanyahu not Israel” kind of guy.
The netanyahus and Ben gvirs only exist to be used as scapegoats, to shift the blame of the genocidal zionist project to simply a few rotten apples. Liberal zionists are just sly foxes instead of wolves, both will try to eat you.
Would you rather have him or the “Israel did nothing wrong” kind of guy?
…
literal vote blue rhetoric that shows up everytime we discuss new york democrats
And I have actually been seeing a rise in just straight Zionism here. It’s a bit disturbing.
not hard when the mod teams’ zionism was never dealt with. if you don’t cut it out, it spreads and festers, especially as arab and muslim users peep the vibe and leave the site
for example, the tolerance and celebration of a zionist being elected is zionist. the idea that jewish votes can only be attained through zionism is zionist. working with zionists is normalization of the colonial state
i think statistically you’ll struggle to find principled antizionists anywhere in american politics.
That’s the point. Amerikkkan politics is unredeemable, and can’t be used. Electoralism is dead in the heart of the beast.
dead as an avenue for liberation, anyway.
well you would think the 1 place you could find them is on a communist forum, but nope
there’s something in the water in NYC that makes Libs think they are socialists. Makes them use Marx in their names and bastardize and vulgarize socialist theory.
It turns out the secret ingredient that makes NYC bagels taste so good is liberalism.
Malcolm X said the fox was deadlier than the wolf because the wolf doesn’t pretend to be your friend while the fox makes you let your guard down.
You’re assuming nobody knows Lander is a Fox; he’s a Fox on a leash who will try to bite us later on, but he’s also a useful shield that insulates DSA from anti-semitism accusations, which reality check, does hurt in New York
Surprise, surprise, now defending supporting a Zionist.
You literally want Susan Collins to win so Platner eats shit
no we think supporting an obvious plant who was a nazi mercenary is over the line. There are over a million people in the state, the weird advocacy group who recruited him should’ve found somebody who wasn’t a fucking nazi mercenary.
Puyi pushed a broom.
Would this hypothetical super-socialist of yours have defeated Dan Goldman in New York’s 10th Congressional District (NY-10) which contains one of the largest and most concentrated Jewish populations of any congressional district in the United States? I’m guessing you had no clue that was the context of the election
Like are you joking? Is this a bit? We just got that dipshit mercenary to run on anti-zionism and anti-genocide and FUCKIN WIN in the heart of Jewish America, we have the motherfucker on a leash and he’s barking to our tune, cry harder about it
Sorry the ultra-zionist didn’t win and prove electoralism is a dead end; clearly we have our priorities straight here
lmao it shouldn’t be that hard to find a universal healthcare liberal who says no more weapons for israel and did not murder civilians for fun. if you think platner minus the irredeemable baggage is a fucking unicorn i have no words for you.
We’ve never spoken about Susan Collins but thank you for immediately lying instead of dragging it out this time lol
No we’ve definitely broached the subject because it’s memorable; you, like last time just refused to engage with the question of whether you’d prefer Platner or ultra-Zionist Susan Collins to win a Senate seat, because even you realize the implications of that question blow your doomer position out the water
“Wow so you support Trump instead of Biden, who is obviously the harm reduction candidate. You should vote for Harris in the upcoming election because she’s pro-choice.”
^ This is you. Why are you insisting on going to bat for the nazi Blackwater mercenary war criminal who is going to immediately continue Collins’ policies? This isn’t reassuring to leftists and it makes you look like you only care about free healthcare, fuck anyone who is anti-imperialist.
If you truly believe we’ve had that conversation then go ahead and quote what I’ve said about it. I will wait (forever).