I’m not opining on UK politics, but rather the way you’re presenting the information. I may know little to nothing about internal UK politics, but I’m very familiar with degradational rhetorical language, and how it can damage ones position. Sorry if my two cents are unwanted, but I’ll share them regardless
Starmer’s poisiton is that of sitting prime minister of the UK. That is not a position worthy of protection, it is a position that needs to be actively dismantled.
Then actually call out policies. Lame insults do nothing to achieve the goal of dismantling anything, they just entrench your position as an unserious effort.
Given that you admit being ignorant on the subject you’re opining on, why should anybody give a fuck what you ‘think’?
I’m not opining on UK politics, but rather the way you’re presenting the information. I may know little to nothing about internal UK politics, but I’m very familiar with degradational rhetorical language, and how it can damage ones position. Sorry if my two cents are unwanted, but I’ll share them regardless
shut the fuck up wesley
Starmer’s poisiton is that of sitting prime minister of the UK. That is not a position worthy of protection, it is a position that needs to be actively dismantled.
Then actually call out policies. Lame insults do nothing to achieve the goal of dismantling anything, they just entrench your position as an unserious effort.
Fuck off you smarmy loser.
No thank you
what if the nicknames are derived from policy?
They called out the policy by calling him kid starver
them pearls aren’t gonna clutch themselves I guess