• Opisek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Do you know why that would be a positive evolutionary trait? Clearly, if they try to retract it, at some point in the history they must have been able to do so.

      • ZephrC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That doesn’t even make any sense if you stop and think about it at all. Sure, a single worker bee dying isn’t a huge deal, but they all do that. It would definitely be better for the hive and the queen if they didn’t rip their own guts out.

    • Muehe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because bee stingers are mostly used against other insects. They don’t get stuck in a chitin exoskeleton, only in the more flexible skin tissue of mammals. In insects the barbs instead pull out soft tissue from inside, thus making them more lethal (to the bees victim).

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      It makes it more dangerous : the sting is attach to the venom bag, so the venom bag gets to empty itself whole if it stays. Evolution would have chosen the survival of the hive, not the survival of the bee.

      One thing is weird though : you can extract the sting of a wasp with a pincer. The wasp will live through it. Why do the bee dies when it loses it’s sting and not the wasp?

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bee genetics are wild and helped develop a system where it doesn’t matter that the workers have tendencies to off themselves.