The ones on the background have different graphic, that alone is not enough because its something it can happens. But the tell is the weight of the container and the way is being handled, unless is a gallon of air it can’t be handled like that.
All the prices are 3.29 as well which is unlikely for real life. I will debate that a rock climber or other strong grip athelete could grip the jug like that, but why would they?
Also with the graphics not lining up, the handle is also on the oposite side for the ones on the shelf which should be displaying the back side of the label which is typically ingredients and nutrition rather than a second full graphic label in the same language.
I don’t think it’s ai though, more like a fake product staged to look real. The rest of the image makes too much sense for ai. It could also be heavily edited with an AI picture as the baseline
From the original post it really does seem to be ai and not photoshop as it was originally from an account that posts ai slop stuff. Sad, I thought it was something with more effort
The compression artifacts are very inconsistent. Like generally when you get compression artifacts on an image, they’re of the same scale across the whole image, because the same process has been applied to the whole image. But with a generated image, there will be some base line compression if the image has been shared, but under that there will be weird artifacting that only appears in certain parts of the image that’s being applied during image generation due to artifacts on images in the training data.
Like, compare the text in the blue sky post, the artifacting there is very consistent, but it’s all over the place in the milk image with certain areas having massive nonsense artifacts, while other parts no more than the text in the blue sky image.
How did you tell?
The ones on the background have different graphic, that alone is not enough because its something it can happens. But the tell is the weight of the container and the way is being handled, unless is a gallon of air it can’t be handled like that.
All the prices are 3.29 as well which is unlikely for real life. I will debate that a rock climber or other strong grip athelete could grip the jug like that, but why would they?
Also with the graphics not lining up, the handle is also on the oposite side for the ones on the shelf which should be displaying the back side of the label which is typically ingredients and nutrition rather than a second full graphic label in the same language.
Not without deforming it, but otherwise slam dunk
I don’t think it’s ai though, more like a fake product staged to look real. The rest of the image makes too much sense for ai. It could also be heavily edited with an AI picture as the baseline
The bottles also have different shapes, and the white on the shelf below have no handle.
From the original post it really does seem to be ai and not photoshop as it was originally from an account that posts ai slop stuff. Sad, I thought it was something with more effort
Also the one close to the camera has a different kind of handle than those on display. The top row milk cartons don’t have space between some of them.
The compression artifacts are very inconsistent. Like generally when you get compression artifacts on an image, they’re of the same scale across the whole image, because the same process has been applied to the whole image. But with a generated image, there will be some base line compression if the image has been shared, but under that there will be weird artifacting that only appears in certain parts of the image that’s being applied during image generation due to artifacts on images in the training data.
Like, compare the text in the blue sky post, the artifacting there is very consistent, but it’s all over the place in the milk image with certain areas having massive nonsense artifacts, while other parts no more than the text in the blue sky image.
I love how everyone is giving you very detailed, technical explanations regarding the image quality.
While I’m just here like “okay look at it? that’s not a product that exists in real life.”
My thought was that it could still be photoshop but it isn’t