An in-depth analysis of the 2024 presidential campaign commissioned by the Democratic National Committee fails to mention the party’s position on Israel’s genocide in Gaza, prompting harsh criticism from Arab American members of the party.

The 192-page report, authored by a Democratic strategist and first published by CNN on Thursday morning, goes in-depth on several factors found to be detrimental to Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign in its ultimate loss to Donald Trump. Despite the contention within the party over then-President Joe Biden’s support for Israel’s genocidal campaign against Palestinians in Gaza, however, the war doesn’t get a single mention.

Also missing from the document are the words “Israel,” “Palestine,” “Arab American,” and “Muslim.”

“Nothing about this surprises me,” said Linda Sarsour, an organizer from Brooklyn who was active in organizing a campaign to pressure Harris to take a stance against the war. “If they don’t change course quickly to center Palestine, foreign policy and recognize the influence of Arab/Palestinian/Muslim/young/progressive American voters, they will likely have to write another autopsy report post 2028 presidential elections.”

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or maybe you just exist in a bubble and can’t see out of it.

    Between the Dems and the republicans, the Dems would have handled Israel and Gaza better than the republicans would have.

    Furthermore, look at the “Most important issue” from the exit polling below. Note that foreign policy was 4%. People weren’t voting for Israel and Gaza.

    https://www.cnn.com/election/2024/exit-polls/national-results/general/president/0

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Between the Dems and the republicans, the Dems would have handled Israel and Gaza better than the republicans would have.

      Oh, yes, just look at how well the Biden administration handled it.

    • chilldrivenspade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      no. it was a great propaganda campaign by maga to paint kamala as a war hawk and claim that only maga would stop these wars. many leftists were swayed against kamala bc of the perception that she would also be a puppet of israel. the crazy thing is how well it works to paint Dems badly while republicans can just openly do exactly what they feared dems would do….israel had a LOT to do with the left staying home, dude.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        True, exit polling doesn’t really capture people who stayed at home. But if you look at the poll below, it looks like the people that stayed at home were a little more in favor of Trump anyway.

        https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/06/26/voter-turnout-2020-2024/

        israel had a LOT to do with the left staying home, dude.

        I’d love to hear if there’s any real numbers that support this, or if it just feels right to you. I think most people cared about Gaza, but not more than gas prices.

        Also, keep in mind that I don’t feel this way, I’m just saying this is the reality of US politics.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            In terms of winning and losing, yeah it’s nothing. And Israel/Gaza is a subset of foreign policy.

            And if you look at the Israel/Gaza specific question, 60% of people responding think our support of Israel is either just right or not enough.

            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              In terms of winning 4% matters quite a lot. That is 8% to one side. Also imagine thinking “most important” means 100% of the reason a person votes.

            • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              And if you look at the Israel/Gaza specific question, 60% of people responding think our support of Israel is either just right or not enough.

              If true, would this not indicate that american elections are meaningless and america has to be destroyed? Why care about the lesser of two evils in a pro-genocide country?

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      While the Gaza war was a key issue for many Arab American and Muslim voters, particularly in a swing state like Michigan, Romman acknowledged that most voters nationwide and in her home state of Georgia were not listing Gaza as their top concern. Still, she said, the issue emerged as something of a smell test for the integrity of Democratic politicians hoping to sell their message to an electorate beset by financial insecurity and healthcare woes.

      “For most voters, if you look at what was their top issue, it’s the economy — of course,” Romman said. “But if you want politicians that are going to put you first and implement the kind of economic issues that you need to have a better life, those are going to be the politicians that are not beholden to special interests. And so Gaza became a way to look for that.”