slazer2au@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前If XCOM didn't exist before AI slop, people would assume missing 3 90% shots in a row was due to AI generated code not just how probability works.message-squaremessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1293arrow-down131
arrow-up1262arrow-down1message-squareIf XCOM didn't exist before AI slop, people would assume missing 3 90% shots in a row was due to AI generated code not just how probability works.slazer2au@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square53linkfedilink
minus-squareLurkingLuddite@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 个月前It’s definitely not accurate, though. Sure, any one roll can screw you over if it’s not 100%, but xcom is literally known for having shitty actual percentages over many rolls even while it’s showing 90%+.
minus-squareStarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 个月前I’m pretty sure that’s by design. By spoofing the real accuracy, you get more dramatic moments which is good for engagement. It’s the same as GMs in tabletop games that fudge rice rolls sometimes.
It’s definitely not accurate, though. Sure, any one roll can screw you over if it’s not 100%, but xcom is literally known for having shitty actual percentages over many rolls even while it’s showing 90%+.
I’m pretty sure that’s by design. By spoofing the real accuracy, you get more dramatic moments which is good for engagement.
It’s the same as GMs in tabletop games that fudge rice rolls sometimes.