• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 days ago

      his (assuming he?) existence can be compared to that of Carcinisation. some species just always evolve into crabs, some always evolve into amorphous tar blobs that embody evil.

    • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 days ago

      One head-type-thing and four limb-type-things, with only two being primarily locomotive, makes that more humanoid than not on an intergalactic body plan scale.

      We are very bad at thinking up truly alien life.

      • SippyCup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I respect the constraints of production budgets. I don’t expect TV aliens to look much different than people with some crap glued to their face.

        Mass Effect at least branched out a little. But all of the squad mates were still basically humanoid. I expect they used mocap and similar limitations. Though it really could have benefitted from an Elcor squad mate.

        “Irritated; you are a jackass… Captain. Irreverent; the cultists… Do not matter. Hopeful; bombard them from orbit and let’s… Go.”

        • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          I don’t expect TV aliens to look much different than people with some crap glued to their face.

          I mean… I kinda do… especially these days when CGI makes up more than half of your budget for nonsense reasons. Why don’t they try harder? They could and it would cost them zero extra.

          • Llamatron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            I’ve never understood this phrase. How does an exception prove a rule? Surely an exception disproves a rule?

              • Korval@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                When enough people know a saying, but don’t understand its intent, its meaning drifts. The idea is supposed to be that the existence of an exception proves that there is a rule, with “rule” being in the sense of a generality.

                I learned that from the Grammar Girl podcast and found it interesting enough that it stuck with me (because it was something I’d long wondered). Her example is a sign that forbids skateboarding while school is in session. “You can infer that you are allowed to skateboard at other times. The rule that the exception proves is that skateboarding is generally allowed. If that were not a rule, why would exceptions be made at all?"

                Transcript: https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/qdtarchive/why-do-we-say-the-exception-that-proves-the-rule/

          • stringere@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            I can’t find the name of them but in one of the Star Wars novels the Millenium Falcon ends up trapped in some ice caverns and they encounter sentient clouds of gas, methane iirc.

            So we do have some people making up cool aliens.

            Oh, the Pequeninos in Speaker for the Dead. They were sentient humanoid beings that became the trees of their world when they died. There’s more to it than that, but that’s the gist.