• Cataphract@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Interesting getting some downvotes with no comment pushbacks on the validity of their scientific process even with posting their methods. Is this just people upset that someone is challenging their beliefs that are being reinforced with the graphic but can’t dispute any positives in their data collection process?

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      What is the problem with their methods? You can’t just link to their methodology and be like, “See? They’re full of shit!” I skimmed and nothing jumped out at me, so how would I go about evaluating or refuting such vague claims?

    • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because there’s literally no argument here except a YouTube video. Wow, how credible.

      Tell me, what I should dispute about a comment whose only argument is “pew is bad”?