• SpacePanda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Im sorry to say this but it’s either your phone or your eyes. My eyes are bad but I can still read it fine. Not trying to be mean just something you might be able to troubleshoot

      • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I was able to read it once zoomed in, but normal text size should have been more readable. The red is oversaturated & doesn’t contrast well against the grey gradient background. A darker red might’ve worked okay, although I’m not certain of that against the darker end of the gradient - the existing color choice certainly barely holds up against the lighter end, but there’s fortunately less text there.

    • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      They shouldn’t in the way that they seem to have ended up. But realistically what happens if you need help in a violent situation or if you’ve had something taken?

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        The same thing you would do in modern society, because the existence of cops does nothing directly for people who find themselves in those situations.

        You defend yourself or others against the violent perpetrator or attempt to escape the situation to avoid harm. In the case of stolen property, you get it replaced or, through the assistance of the local community, have it located and returned to you.

        Cops don’t protect people from harm. They show up after the fact to assign blame and write a report that will get tossed in a bin as soon as the ink dries.

        https://issuu.com/projectnia/docs/policeabolition101_zine_digital_singlepages

  • torik@lemmychan.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    How do anarchists propose civilizations handle things like power plants? Acquiring and transmitting energy at the levels needed to maintain a modern standard of living depends a lot on communities coming together and allocating resources like a government.

    • Vegafjord demcon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      NOTE Using weed brackets [] for words that has to be weeded out.

      The word [civilization] implies that there are people who are [uncivilized]. It constructs supremacy of the [developed] over the [under developed].

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/the-anarchist-faq-editorial-collective-an-anarchist-faq-full#text-amuse-label-seci0

      Anarchism is not no organisation, it’s bottom up organisation. So the power plant would be run by the people working it, who in turn would be part of the community. The community would organise with other communities to plan, develop, and share resources for the mutual benefit of them all.

      Shockingly for some people you do not need someone to come in and force people to do things the way they want it, you can actually work together and co-operate with people.

      Edit: Holy shit your instance is fucking revolting.