You must log in or # to comment.
I mean if we’re going to pin the whole economy on an entertainment experience surely we can find a better one than this
there’s also sports betting and short form video slop
AI will do wonders for them 😌
Copilot? For entertainment purposes only.
All those data centers? SATIRE.
Tanking the economy? A teachable moment.
So they’re literally saying it’s a busy box (see image) while simultaneously saying it will replace large swathes of human labor. Deeply unserious.
Large swathes of human labor is spent on busy work, because improving society would have untold and unprofitable consequences for the current regime.
What I’m getting at is that it’s something given to babys to make them feel like they’re doing something. In the case of AI, it’s sold to CEOs as a way to automate labor, when it really just produces worthless dogshit that appears to be useful to the untrained eye. The busy work should absolutely be automated and people should be freed from drudgery but these planet-destroying toys controlled by corporations are not the way to get there.
Capitalist apologists will tell you that all of this busywork is economically necessary, critical even.
It is necessary to the maximization of profit. Capitalists don’t employ all those marketers, salesmen, accountants, HR people, etc. for fun and charity. They do it because capitalism requires massive amounts of socially useless labor to get the maximum sales volume and market dominance.
Is a certain quantity of this socially useless labor mathematically vital to the survival of capital, or is the proliferation of this labor a sort of unchecked outgrowth that’s an unforeseen outcome?
“The answer clearly isn’t economic: it’s moral and political.”“The answer clearly isn’t economic: it’s moral and political.”
that’s not at all clear to me
It’s literally straight out of the article that coined the term “Bullshit Jobs”, a point that’s made several times
It’s not at all clear to me how capitalists are directly compelled to do what they do by macroeconomic forces alone, in such a way that it is not possible to imagine them acting otherwise. That is a far-reaching claim that demands the burden of proof.
what is this an anarchist diy fidget spinner?
“Copilot is for entertainment purposes only. It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended”
lmao, I can’t wait to share this with the “AI” evangelists I work with on Monday
Source is on Micro$$oft’s ToS page: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse
But when it reports to cops then is it “for entertainment purposes only”?
Tale as old as tech
It can’t even write a word doc. If there’s “AI” built into Microsoft word I’d expect it to be able to read and make changes to the doc I’m editing but no it can only output text in it’s own dialog window.
Nope, the ability for it to actually interact with non-chat-window stuff is that whole “agent” bullshit they’ve been pushing lately.
“Hey, we finally let the chatbot send text to the command line! What do you mean it deleted your entire email box? Give us money please.”
Isn’t it weird how they can surface a million dialog boxes to ask you if you want to switch back to Edge, but cannot fathom having a confirmation dialog for using LLMs to make potentially destructive changes to your files or system?
Seems so common sense that there must be some business strategy implying that having the user in the driver’s seat is not the direction they would like to go. Microsoft certainly has the UI people necessary to design the UX for human intervention / supervision of LLM tool calling.
you gotta upgrade ($$) so it can do that.
lmao
Threatening to replace you for entertainment purposes
Windows is for entertainment purposes only
