Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 days agoSlop detectives be like rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1871arrow-down14
arrow-up1867arrow-down1imageSlop detectives be like rulelemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 days agoThe problem is it’s not plagiarism detector (it would also be a pretty bad one since it can’t detect quotes) it’s an AI detector. It’s saying that a direct quote is AI, Which obviously isn’t true, it’s a quote, which is a different thing. If 10% of my thesis is quoting other works that’s not the same as my thesis being 10% AI generated. The distinction needs to be made.
The problem is it’s not plagiarism detector (it would also be a pretty bad one since it can’t detect quotes) it’s an AI detector.
It’s saying that a direct quote is AI, Which obviously isn’t true, it’s a quote, which is a different thing.
If 10% of my thesis is quoting other works that’s not the same as my thesis being 10% AI generated. The distinction needs to be made.