• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 days ago

    Airships are impractical, but I’d still like to fly in one.

    Probably part of the reason they seem so luxurious is that they stopped flying them at the peak of their luxury. Meanwhile, planes started fairly luxurious but they’ve become more and more unpleasant for the passengers as time went on.

    Still, even a business jet seems cramped and loud compared to what people had on ships like the Hindenburg. The amount of space inside makes it seem a lot more like a cruise ship than a plane.

    Airship interior drawing

    Hindenburg lounge photo

    If we have to have billionaires, couldn’t we at least get one eccentric one who has a cool personal airship instead of the penis rockets?

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 days ago

      They could not compete with planes on price. If it takes a week for maybe 50 passengers to travel between continents, the passenger tickets would have to cover all operating expenses for the airship during that time.

      A jet plane could do 10x as many trips and carry around 300 passengers each time

      I think I read that a zeppelin ticket cost as much as the yearly salary for a teacher back in the day.

        • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          What do you mean? Trains did not travel between Europe and America. They have lower operating costs, more capacity and a lot more domestic passengers? They are also not limited by cargo weight.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 days ago

    This picture was not taken in 1936, it was taken in 1929 or 1930.

    That’s R101, note her distinctive ring of circular intake vents around the nose. R101 crashed killing most of the passengers and crew in October of 1930, which pretty much killed British interest in airships. Her rival/cousin, R100, was scrapped the following year.

    I’m unaware of any other airship that would have been flying in 1936 that moored to a high mast like that; the Germans preferred to moor their airships at ground level and load/unload via ramps directly to the surface like an ocean liner at a pier, the Americans never operated passenger airships. USS Akron and USS Macon were both aircraft carriers that used the vastly inferior yet safer helium as a lifting gas. Where R101 and Hindenberg crashed and burned, Akron and Macon merely crashed.

  • Codpiece@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 days ago

    This is really interesting to me, thanks for posting this as I haven’t seen it before.

    One of my ancestors brothers was at the front of the R101 airship that flew a few years before this and crashed in France.