• VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    12 days ago

    Around 2015, My niece told me she worked at a bank teller and the first thing they did was require her to install the bank’s app and rate it five stars. She said her phone is too old and they got angry. And she’d tell me they’d do “phone sweeps” to see if the app was on people’s phones.

    Do min-wage companies still do this or do they know better?

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        12 days ago

        I have told managers, to their faces, I do not have a smart phone… While holding my smart phone.

        So far, while most have quite noticeably glanced at my phone, none have actually called me out on it.

        If any of them ever do, I will just get a prepaid flip phone and use that for work.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          12 days ago

          I’ve just straight up told an employer before that if a smart phone was required to do my job then they needed to provide me a company phone.

          they found other options for me, but it really pissed off my supervisor. eventually i left because he was an asshole. gave them a -1 day notice and just stopped showing up. i do freelance work now. they deserved that hit.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 days ago

        Welcome to employee abuse. When your job is tied to whether you can pay rent, health insurance and credit, they’ve got you by the balls.

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        12 days ago

        America is a pro-business country.

        They can fire you for any reason, like if they hate you’re gay. They don’t SAY that. They wishy washy it with “not a cultural fit”. Or throw you into difficult situations so they can fire you with “unable to complete tasks”.

        I have Europeans who joined my company surprised at how little protection they get.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          12 days ago

          They don’t even have to give a reason. The only reason they’ll try to justify it is to prevent the employee from getting unemployment benefits.

          • tmyakal@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            When I worked at UPS, we weren’t allowed to have beards and our hair couldn’t be long enough to touch our ears. Literally fireable offenses.

            • Don Piano@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              12 days ago

              Correct, some contracts cannot be done. Depending on the specifics, the illegal parts of the contract are unenforceable, or the entire thing is null and void. Employers often hate this, because it limits the exploitation they can enact upon employees.

        • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          If they’re paying your bill, buy another phone that’s “work only”. Although you shouldn’t have to buy the second phone either, well, here we are.

              • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                oh gods i’m in the executive phase of my career (or would be if i wasn’t disabled) aren’t i. that’s terrifying

                uh, post! execute posting! maybe that will get me out of it.

    • ctry21@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      12 days ago

      There is a bank in the UK that used employee bank balances to prove they didn’t need a pay rise last year, which they were able to do because banking with them was a condition of employment

      When I was in school they once checked everyone’s phones to make sure we had installed Twitter and followed the school’s accounts for each department. That was about a decade ago so it’s probably TikTok or something by now.