Not interested in talking to you, any disagreement will be dismissed as hostile. I wasn’t “relitigating” anything, I had not paid attention to the username of the person CommunistCuddlefish had been talking to until you replied to me, I was commiserating with her about smug condescending settlers.
You can reply to me in whatever threads you want, but I won’t be reading it or replying.
On one occasion, I said that your complaints about a third party’s hostility were silly, but I won’t dismiss arguments you make on the actual point on such a basis. I don’t think that I have ever done such a thing on this website and certainly I try not to. I think that’s an extremely unproductive way to try to communicate and it doesn’t even make sense. Like you, I might just ignore something, but that’s not the same thing.
I wasn’t “relitigating” anything
I really struggle to believe this when it was not even 24 hours ago that in one of your shadowboxing replies to other people replying to me you talked about people (who I guess definitely aren’t me) claiming Israel is a victim, and I replied to just that sentence complaining that it was a bad faith attack, and now you are saying:
The most annoying part is they’ll pick a single sentence out of something you’ve said to argue an entire imaginary point on that is just being materialist according to them, but somehow always results in picking fights with marginalized people while asserting that it can’t possibly be interpreted as a defense of the oppressor, because they never specifically said they support the oppressors.
But hey, I can’t read you mind, so I guess I don’t know. If that’s my mistake, then I apologize.
Not interested in talking to you, any disagreement will be dismissed as hostile. I wasn’t “relitigating” anything, I had not paid attention to the username of the person CommunistCuddlefish had been talking to until you replied to me, I was commiserating with her about smug condescending settlers.
You can reply to me in whatever threads you want, but I won’t be reading it or replying.
Bás do Mheiriceá
Bleaist eascainí
Chead acu focáil leo i dtigh an diabhail
On one occasion, I said that your complaints about a third party’s hostility were silly, but I won’t dismiss arguments you make on the actual point on such a basis. I don’t think that I have ever done such a thing on this website and certainly I try not to. I think that’s an extremely unproductive way to try to communicate and it doesn’t even make sense. Like you, I might just ignore something, but that’s not the same thing.
I really struggle to believe this when it was not even 24 hours ago that in one of your shadowboxing replies to other people replying to me you talked about people (who I guess definitely aren’t me) claiming Israel is a victim, and I replied to just that sentence complaining that it was a bad faith attack, and now you are saying:
But hey, I can’t read you mind, so I guess I don’t know. If that’s my mistake, then I apologize.