BYD is kicking off a price war with gas-powered cars as new lower-priced electric vehicles begin rolling out. After launching the new Qin Plus EV Honor Edition on Monday, BYD said it’s “officially opening a new era of electricity is lower than oil.”

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    BYD is coming on fierce. Other car makers ought to be very afraid right now. $15K is cheaper than most gas vehicles. That’s … compelling to say the least.

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      It really is compelling and maybe it’s because in the US we’re not getting much in the budget EV segment but I’m really hoping the Aptera goes through without a hitch.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        We’re just not getting any of the chinese EVs. Many of them are only so cheap because of how much their government is subsidizing them so they can build market share.

        The car only has 75 miles of range which just won’t fly at all in the US. Anything sub 200 is considered unusable here. nvm thats the phev model. That’s not bad for a phev. but 260 miles of range and 15k has to be heavily subsidized. And I doubt Americans would be willing to buy a Chinese car.

        • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          US auto industry is also heavily subsidised.

          When we do, we call it “creating jobs and growing the economy “

          When someone else does it, it’s cheating .

        • Delphia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          There was a lot of talk about how nobody would buy chinese cars in Australia too… they are everywhere.

          People can get a chinese diesel dual cab 4x4 pickup for $37k Australian, the CHEAPEST Ford Raptor starts at $87k.

          • FlounderBasket@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            The raptor is the top end performance version of the ranger. Some quick googling says an Australian ranger starts around $37k as well.

          • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I was gonna say, in the past people bitched about Korean cars, now Hyundai and Kia are everywhere. Even further back they bitched about Japanese cars.

              • Liz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                About half right. The other half is that a developing nation basically has to start at low end manufacturing like textiles, then work their way into things like cheap toys, and slowly build their technical expertise and abilities along the way. While they’re making cheap, low-quality products they develop a reputation for cheap, low-quality products, which biases people against anything made in that country. But, if everything goes right, they start to produce medium and then high quality products and shed their old reputation.

                Korean products used to be the cheap junk, but now they’re well-made. A lot of Chinese companies are starting to put out high quality stuff, and you can see that reflected in the pride they’re starting to take in their products. I’m seeing more and more Chinese companies making no effort to hide the fact that they’re Chinese, something that was quite rare even a decade ago.

        • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          This same thing happens every couple of decades. In the 70s and into the 80s, no one wanted to buy a Japanese car - or virtually any Japanese products. They were considered inferior to their American-made counterparts (cars, but also electronics like radios and TVs). The inferiority of Japanese products was regular material for stand up comics and late night TV. The only reason, we were told, that anyone was buying their products was that they were dumping them on us at a loss. Now, Toyota isn’t synonymous with “cheap piece of crap import” but is considered a quality product that rivals American automakers. If you can tolerate a large dose of regular old establishment racism and want to flash back to how America saw the Japanese in the 80s, check out Michael Crichton’s Rising Sun. Or really about 70% of what was produced in the 80s, I guess, but that one is a keeper.

          Fast forward a decade or two and they were saying the exact same thing about Korean cars. Same with Korean electronics in general - why buy Korean when you can buy Japanese?

          Now it’s Chinese cars. I’m sure in the next decade or two it will be Vietnamese or Indian cars.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            We still don’t like Korean cars that much in the US. Kyundai were making some really good progress at establishing themselves as a real brand. Then the sand issues came out, followed up by the stealing, sprinkle in some bad choices all around and I’d say they’ve set themselves back a good 5-10 years.

            The Japanese really stuck around by making quality cars. Mitsubishi barely exists in the US, Isuzu couldn’t make it (outside of trucks), and I can’t believe Suzuki made it until 2012. They rode on the coat tails of Toyota, Honda, and Nissan (who’s currently having a bit of a crisis). These cheap Chinese cars are not quality. I’ve been in a number of them in Costa Rica and they all start out nice, but rapidly fall apart. Some of them are even rusting away, in Costa fucking Rica. You’ll still see 1950s land cruisers casually driving around down there. But I don’t think any of these Chinese cars will make it that long.

            Maybe with their luxury brands they’ll make something lasting. But from my limited experience with them, I can’t imagine Americans buying them, let alone not laughing at them.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              We laughed at the first wave of Japanese imports too, but people bought them for the price. Now many of us prefer them for the quality even at a higher price.

              Yugo went the other way. We laughed at them but a few people bought them for the price. However they soon found out just how bad the product was and no one was willing to see if they’d improve.

              Which way will Chinese manufacturers go? It’s all a guess since it hasn’t happened yet but I know Chinese companies can make reliable stuff with decent quality. I think their chances are pretty good against legacy manufacturers unwilling to risk change in the face of their pre-existinG product lines

        • thechadwick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, unless they can buy a car for 15k. Principled boycotts of blood diamonds and child labor cocoa are more likely than someone making working wages willingly paying a 40% premium for a legacy GM shitcan.

          Not that BYD is going to be selling a model 3 competitor at that price, but no one is selling a new Camry near that either. The 1st Gen civic was a basket case too, now it’s a spaceship and that’s without government-led IP raids…

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          While there are tensions with China, people still voted with their wallets in previous such “invasions”.

          • Back in the 70s-80s, there was a lot of tension with Japan, arguing similar things, but the smaller, efficient, cheaper vehicles were compelling enough to practically destroy American car companies who were unable to produce similar. Actually, UAW reaction where Japanese branded vehicles at UAW plants were destroyed, w may have been the root of my former hatred of unions.
          • when Korean manufacturers broke into the US market, the tensions weren’t as high but there was a lot of attacks against “inferior” products and plenty of bigotry. While Hyundai/Kia have had recent missteps, they’ve come on strong, grown like crazy, and now have a much better reputation for quality and support, while still holding a price advantage and compelling features
    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Mind you, that’s the price in China. By the time they bring those to the US or Europe, that price usually doubles.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      No way that can release one here in the US for the same price as a 10 year old Camry. Unless the Chinese government is going to pay for 1/2 the cost of the car, we aren’t going to see brand new vehicles selling for $15k.

      • pop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s a you problem. The parent comment doesn’t even mention US and it is not the center of the universe. China is one of the top polluter currently, and if they alone phase out ICE cars, it would be a net benefit for the world (if they use renewables).

        Not everything has to reach the US to be considered “cheap”. Western news mentioning USD doesn’t mean the company is looking for people in US specifically to buy it. Same as not everyone buying Tesla gets it in local prices abroad.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          This announcement coincides with BYD announcing they’re building a plant in Mexico likely targeting the US market, and them running sponsored english articles talking about how they’re beating companies like Tesla in order to drum up demand in the US.

          Also I wouldn’t be so sure about this reducing pollution in China as these cars are being discarded like outdated iPhones. https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2023-china-ev-graveyards/

      • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        We’re seeing that across my commodity chemical market prices too. The prices China offers seem… literally impossible. We are almost certain that China is paying either all the capital for the infrastructure, or just subsidizing 10x harder than we (US/EU) do.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I witnessed them do the same with photovoltaic cells a decade ago which lead to my wife’s employer shutting down their US manufacturing facility to send it overseas. Nobody could compete with their subsidized solar panels.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      When they start selling in the US, the destruction of legacy manufacturers will be worse the the 1970s small car invasion

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    If the entry model came to the US, it could become the Ford Taurus or Toyota Camry of electrics. But the charging infrastructure would need to build up massively to be able to support that kind of volume.

    The fact that they’re hitting both low end and high end (plus everything in between) should be massively concerning to every car company.

    • Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Should we be rooting for or against this company. I’m all for competition, but Elon Musk has made me lose faith in any car company.

      • Opafi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        Rooting for any company is always a bad idea. Companies are never your friend. They’ll always put profits first - way before ethics, values or even laws or common sense. Don’t trust them, don’t depend on them and especially don’t root for them.

        • ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Hear hear! This is one of the few black-and-white things in life. Every little thing a company does (or says) is meant for the betterment of their next quarterly report.

          No matter how much a company says they “stand with” anyone, regardless of the popularity of the cause, their goal is to look better and convince more people that only they offer truly ethical consumption.

          To be fair, I enjoy spectating any and all drama between the corps. However, in the immortal words of a shitty sci-fi movie poster: Whoever wins, we lose.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Personally I root against basically any Chinese company by principle.

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    Starting at 420 km range, that’s actually pretty impressive. We might be looking at a tipping point here for electric cars.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Meanwhile in the US the entire automatic industry are keeping prices of EVs higher than crap and also eliminating their affordable car lines.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not in the US but have been waiting for these cars to make their way here. We already have other cars by Chinese companies and I just saw my first one today.

    I’ve curious about their pricing. Hopefully they are cheap here too.

    Sadly, I don’t have a way to charge an electric car at my condo.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Parts count on EVs is an order of magnitude less than combustion. They should scale for batteries and motors with the price being an order of magnitude less expensive to build them. The foundry, machining, and precision parts of combustion are massive operations.

    The real problem is that military tech relies on the same supply chain and EV’s don’t handle battle quite like combustion. So what does the USA do? Pretend that this is not the real issue and build luxury EV’s instead because the scale will still follow the lower end.

    Mark my words, until you see most military vehicles going electric, we won’t see low cost mass produced EV’s. It has nothing to do with what is best for any of us. It has everything to do with exploitation and killing people abroad over petty nonsense for the most part.