• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Most of the pioneers of science and rational thinking were religious. One can believe in one thing based on logic and evidence and still have beliefs that aren’t as well grounded. Newton was a genius and paved the way for so many things, yet dabbled in the mystics and alchemy. Doesn’t downplay his science work.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most of them were forced to be religious or they’d be burned alive as heretics.

      How many were actually atheists? Id wager most

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also, for a long time one of the only ways a non-rich person could get an education was by joining the clergy

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          It turns out that taking 10% of an entire community’s wages can fund so much more than extravagant buildings… like, an education!

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yep.

        If you weren’t doing science under the church, the church was rarely happy someone was doing science.

        Everything had to be approved by the church at every step. Not just science, but often art as well.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe deists, not necessarily convinced of the Christian god but thinking there could be something in control.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I bet some of the non devout were agnostic deists, believing in general “intelligent creation”.

        Some of these folks view the pursuit of knowledge on the universe as understanding God’s designs.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Especially once you get into genetics and evolution. A lot of those theories directly contradict creationist theories.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Catholics don’t have a problem with science in fact the belief is that it is a sin if you have a talent given by God and waste it.

        The problem are the Christian sects that decided to interpret the Bible literally that led to these conclusions.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yep, for most of history what we’d call “science-ing” was done by people called natural philosophers, people who blended early scientific thought with questions of theology (ex. “How can I understand what God built outside our planet?”)