• oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    I rather think the old car industry is just trying to keep the prices up. Non-electric cars have thousands of moving parts compared to electric ones. New electric cars are just large RC cars with luxury features; they should be much cheaper to build, not more expensive! Add to this that manufacturers seem to have really cut down on the quality controls, with most new car models you are the quality test department.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      The electric motor for a car, mass produced, shouldn’t cost as much as an internal combustion engine. But with a century of development of supply chains and manufacturing prowess and automation, it seems it’s possible.

      However, the batteries are also a huge cost component, and China has developed a huge lead on building them that hasn’t been matched. The lead was likely developed with government funding, but it’s not like government research money, government loans, and government subsidies are an impossibility outside of China.

      China doesn’t have a lot of fossil reserves and is working hard on energy independence through electrification and generation via solar and nuclear. The “developed world”’s resistance to moving off fossil fuels isnt going to end well, in my non-expert opinion.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        I’ve got an unsubstantiated theory. China got fed up with the rest of the world bickering about how to combat climate change. Instead they asked where they could get most bang for their buck independently?

        Flooding the world with cheap solar panels and cheap electric cars looks like a highly cost efficient method.

        • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          It’s not a great theory given that China has a shitton of coal plants and is building a ton more.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 days ago

            I never said they were idealistic about it. If it’s cheaper to flood out solar panels, but build coal, they will do. They are likely maxing out on renewable deployment, but still need more power.

            It’s akin to a meat eater not going vegetarian, but persuading a dozen friends to cut back on meat, with got vegetarian food. If it’s a net gain, call it a win.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            Enlightened self interest. Climate change will fuck china over. Slowing it is definitely in their interests. They are already maxing out on installing renewables in china.

            They likely did the maths and concluded it was cheaper to help the west decarbonise than try and replace their coal power plants.

            I personally disagree with a lot of aspects of China’s governing, but they are very good at long term planning. It’s a lot easier when you expect to be in charge in 20 years, to plan for 20 year time spans.