• IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Genuine question, how is it sexist? Is their no acknowledgment of biological differences between men and women as a general rule (trans issues being more of an exception to the rule)? We acknowledge differences in general in regards to sports, bathrooms, fitting rooms, the way clothes are made, people’s consumption of pornography, magazines and media. Why on this point are we ignoring that all of those things ls are real and happen and pretending there’s no difference?

      • Manticore@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        Men and women both have nipples. The difference is that women might need to pull them put to feed a baby. If we want to treat them differently, should it not be reversed?

      • Dadifer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        58 minutes ago

        The only reason to cover women’s nipples is because the gender in power may have hormonal changes that they are unwilling to control.

      • LastOneSitting@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Because the sexualization of the female nipple is the only reason it is illegal to bare it in public. There is no universal or biological reason to ban it, just a cultural conditioning.

        • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yes, I guess what I’m asking is are we pretending that this “conditioning” isn’t a real thing? I also read recently (sorry if this is wrong) that there was a study done on arousal of breasts between societies where they are covered up vs where they are not. It found the level of arousal remained consistent.

          • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 minutes ago

            Yes, I guess what I’m asking is are we pretending that this “conditioning” isn’t a real thing? I also read recently (sorry if this is wrong) that there was a study done on arousal of breasts between societies where they are covered up vs where they are not. It found the level of arousal remained consistent.

            Why wouldn’t having to deal with that arousal be the problem and responsibility of the aroused instead of, by default and preemtively, limiting the rights of any prospective and involuntary “arousee” in existence?

      • Nounka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Why should a nipple be hidden only if it is a female one. Why would man have the right to walk without t-shirts and woman be punished for the same walk?

        Yet imo it should be the other way. Males need to cover up to. Lets see how fast they start complaining.

        • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          57 minutes ago

          I think there’s less of a need for men to cover up. That not to say I don’t agree with your point entirely. While shirtless men do seem to arouse women and gay men, correct me if if wrong, it’s seems like it’s more of a overall thing, where with women the arousal is mostly centred around the breasts themselves and the nipples.

          I think it’s also more appropriate to say feminine breasts, I know this opinion can vary person to person but most people can agree man boobs generally don’t excite people, it’s the muscle and tone that women find attractive. This can apply to feminine breasts but I think it’s generally more accepted that they are more likely to arouse or at least be interesting.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There are differences, but there is no need for different rules.

        Can you, or are you willing to, say outright, why it should be illegal?

        • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Because I think having breasts is different to not having them and that human arousal and disgust (may be a strong word) is real and that as a general rule it’s appropriate and even beneficial to exclude the extremes of these things from day to day life unless the individual wants to opt in. I suppose a line has to be drawn somewhere and given that there is a real reaction across most of society it’s a reasonable place to draw it.